Pengelolaan piutang pajak bumi dan bangunan perdesaan dan perkotaan pasca peralihan di Kabupaten Katingan

Authors

  • Afni Nooraini Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri
  • Christian Anugrah Pratama Sekretariat Daerah Kabupaten Katingan
  • Marja Sinurat Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54259/akua.v1i2.691

Keywords:

Receivable Management, Rural and Urban Land and Building Tax (PBB-P2), Regional Original Income (PAD)

Abstract

The government has transferred the Rural and Urban Land and Building Tax from the central tax to a regional tax to provide additional sources of income for regional development, however, after the transition, there was an increase in PBB-P2 receivables. This study aims to analyze the management of PBB-P2 receivables, analyze factors affecting highly PBB-P2 receivables and analyze the efforts of Katingan Regency Government to reduce PBB-P2 receivables. This study uses a descriptive qualitative research method with an inductive approach. Data collection techniques through interviews and documentation. Sampling was done by purposive sampling method with 11 informants. This study concludes that the management of PBB-P2 receivables in Katingan Regency has not been carried out properly. The increase in PBB-P2 receivables in Katingan Regency is due to the lack of updating of tax subject and object data, lack of competence of tax management apparatus, lack of socialization for the community, and low public awareness of paying taxes. Various efforts have been made by BPKAD Katingan Regency, namely making PBB-P2 data collection applications, not printing Tax Returns Payable for people who have receivables, and collecting taxpayers who are no longer domiciled in Katingan Regency.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah. .

A. Juliarini, “Komparasi Penerimaan Pajak Daerah Kota Dan Kabupaten Di Indonesia Setelah Berlakunya Undang-Undang Pajak Daerah Dan Retribusi Daerah,” J. BPPK Badan Pendidik. dan Pelatih. Keuang., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1–10, 2020, doi: 10.48108/jurnalbppk.v13i2.227.

Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2009 tentang Pajak Daerah dan Retribusi Daerah. .

D. J. P. Keuangan, Pedoman Umum Pengelolaan Pajak Bumi dan Bangunan Perdesaan dan Perkotaan. 2014.

D. A. Setiawan, “Ada Persoalan Pajak PBB-P2 di Daerah, Ini Temuan BPK,” news.ddtc.co.id, 2020.

M. Harefa, “Kendala Implementasi dan Efektivitas Pemungutan Pajak PBB-P2 Oleh Pemerintah Kota Makassar,” J. Ekon. dan Kebijak. Publik, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 67–82, 2016.

Z. Zulkifli, L. Kalangi, and H. Manossoh, “Analisis Penerimaan Pajak Bumi Dan Bangunan Perdesaan Dan Perkotaan (PBB-P2) Terhadap Kontribusi Pendapatan Asli Daerah (PAD) Di Kota Gorontalo,” J. Ris. Akunt. Dan Audit. “Goodwill,” vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 171–179, 2017, doi: 10.35800/jjs.v8i2.17850.

M. N. G. W. Huda, “ANALISIS EFEKTIVITAS DAN KONTRIBUSI PENERIMAAN PAJAK BUMI DAN BANGUNAN PERDESAAN DAN PERKOTAAN TERHADAP PENDAPATAN ASLI DAERAH KOTA YOGYAKARTA,” vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 284–290, 2021.

C. A. Chandra, H. Sabijono, and T. Runtu, “EFEKTIVITAS DAN KONTRIBUSI PENERIMAAN PAJAK BUMI DAN BANGUNAN PERDESAAN DAN PERKOTAAN (PBB-P2) TERHADAP PENERIMAAN PENDAPATAN ASLI DAERAH (PAD) DI KOTA GORONTALO TAHUN 2016-2018,” vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 290–298, 2020.

A. D. A. Patra and A. Rusli, “Analisis Potensi Pajak Bumi dan Bangunan (PBB-P2) Pasca Pengalihan Dari Pajak Pusat Menjadi Pajak Daerah (Studi Empiris Pada Pemerintah Kota Palopo),” Pengaruh Pemberian Kredit Usaha Rakyat Terhadapa Pendapatan Usaha Mikro Pada PT. Bank SULSELBAR Kant. Pus. Makasar, vol. 2, no. April, pp. 1–10, 2019, doi: Vol. 2 No. 1.

N. Anisa, E. Nuraina, and L. V. Wihartanti, “Analisis Efektivitas Dan Kontribusi Pbb-P2 Untuk Meningkatkan Pendapatan Asli Daerah Kabupaten Magetan,” J. PROMOSI J. Pendidik. Ekon. UM Metro, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 45–58, 2019.

D. D. Praptono, “Piutang PBB Nunggak Rp 88, 9 M, BPKPD Ancam Blokir SPPT Wajib Pajak,” radarbali.jawapos.com, Nov. 23, 2020.

Detakhukum, “Banyak Wajib Pajak PBB Pedesaan Dan Perkotaan Nunggak Mencapai 1,2 Triliun,” 2020.

“Rencana Strategis BPKAD Kabupaten Katingan Tahun 2018-2023.”

Ismail, Taufik & Ramayani, Y. (2021), Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan Terhadap Kepuasan Pelanggan Kantor Indihome Gegerkalong. Jurnal Ilmiah MEA (Manajemen, Ekonomi dan Akutansi, 5(3), 413-423. https://doi.org/10.31955/mea.vol5.iss3.pp413-423.

Moha, Sartika & Sjendry, L. (2016), Analisis Kualitas Pelayanan Dan Fasilitas Terhadap Kepuasan Konsumen Pada Hotel Yuta Di Kota Manado. Jurnal EMBA, 4(1), 575-584 3. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/2927-ID-analisis-kualitas-pelayanan-dan-fasilitas-terhadap-kepuasan-konsumen-pada-hotel.pdf.

Downloads

Published

2022-04-29

How to Cite

Afni Nooraini, Christian Anugrah Pratama, & Marja Sinurat. (2022). Pengelolaan piutang pajak bumi dan bangunan perdesaan dan perkotaan pasca peralihan di Kabupaten Katingan. AKUA: Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 1(2), 186–194. https://doi.org/10.54259/akua.v1i2.691

Issue

Section

Articles