Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kecurangan di Perguruan Tinggi Swasta di Indonesia

Authors

  • Diah Astuti Universitas Islam Indonesia (UII)
  • Arief Rahman Universitas Islam Indonesia (UII)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54259/akua.v4i4.5663

Keywords:

Coercive Pressure, Fraud, Institutional Theory, Private Universities

Abstract

Fraud in higher education institutions, particularly in Private Universities (Perguruan Tinggi Swasta/PTS), poses a serious threat to institutional reputation, financial integrity, and governance effectiveness. Such unethical practices can undermine public trust and disrupt the sustainability of educational operations. This study aims to analyze the factors influencing fraud in Indonesian PTS by employing the Institutional Theory framework, which emphasizes how organizational behavior is shaped by institutional pressures. Specifically, this research examines the influence of coercive, mimetic, and normative pressures, as well as the role of information technology in fraud prevention efforts. A quantitative approach using a survey method was applied, involving 100 respondents consisting of structural lecturers and administrative staff across various PTS in Indonesia. The collected data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to test the proposed hypotheses. The results indicate that coercive, mimetic, and normative pressures significantly affect fraud occurrence, suggesting that institutional environments strongly shape behavioral tendencies. Additionally, the effective utilization of information technology was found to play a crucial role in strengthening internal controls and reducing opportunities for fraudulent practices. This study contributes theoretically to the development of financial governance research in the education sector by integrating institutional theory with technological perspectives, and it offers practical insights for university management in formulating more effective, measurable, and sustainable anti-fraud policies to safeguard institutional accountability and credibility.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acfe, 2024. Fraud Risk Management. The Institute Of Internal Auditors Indonesia, 2.

Macailao, M.C., 2020. Raising The Red Flags: The Concept And Indicators Of Occupational Fraud. Journal Of Critical Reviews, 7(11), Pp.26–29.

Acfe, 2022. Occupational Fraud 2022: A Report To The Nations. Association Of Certified Fraud Examiners, Pp.1–96.

Suh, J.B., Shim, H.S. And Button, M., 2018. Exploring The Impact Of Organizational Investment On Occupational Fraud: Mediating Effects Of Ethical Culture And Monitoring Control. International Journal Of Law, Crime And Justice, 53, Pp.46–55.

Darmayanti, N., Rosyida, I. A., & Irawan, G. A. (2020). Pengaruh dimensi fraud diamond terhadap perilaku kecurangan akademik mahasiswa jurusan akuntansi. J-MACC, Journal of Management and Accounting, 3(2), 41–52. Universitas Islam Darul ‘Ulum Lamongan.

Gultom, S. A., & Safrida, E. (2020). Analisis pengaruh fraud diamond dan GONE theory terhadap academic fraud (Studi kasus mahasiswa akuntansi se Sumatera Utara). Jurnal EKSIS, 9(3), 113–125.

Joseph, C. Et Al., 2020. Development Of The University Fraud Prevention Disclosure Index. Journal Of Financial Crime, 28(3), Pp.883–891.

Walker, N. And Holtfreter, K., 2015. Applying Criminological Theory To Academic Fraud. Journal Of Financial Crime, 22(1), Pp.48–62.

Muhammad Asyraf Haziq Rossli, K.M.E.K.G., 2021. Determinants Of Academic Fraud In Higher Education Institutions: A Fraud Triangle Perspective. Psychology And Education Journal, 58(2), Pp.3879–3892.

Canberra, U. Of, 2014. Fraud And Corruption Control Plan. Available At: Www.Canberra.Edu.Au/ Policies/Policyprocedure/Index/405.

Tristiana, I. (2021). Pengaruh faktor-faktor dalam dimensi fraud triangle terhadap perilaku kecurangan akademik mahasiswa (Studi kasus pada mahasiswa Manajemen Universitas Alma Ata Yogyakarta tahun 2020). IJMA (Indonesian Journal of Management and Accounting), 2(1), 26–36. Universitas Alma Ata Yogyakarta.

Rusliyawati. (2024). Faktor fraud triangle dan sosial yang mempengaruhi cheating online pada mahasiswa akuntansi. Jurnal Audit dan Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Tanjungpura (JAAKFE), 13(1), 50–68.

Abatcha, B.M., 2025. The Moderating Effect Of Mdas Type On The Relationship Between Mimetic Pressure And The Use Of Forensic Accounting In Public Sector : Evidence From Some Selected Mdas In. International Journal Of Economics, Finance & Entrepreneurship, 9(8), Pp.132–148.

Az-Zahra, R., & Maharani, N. K. (2025). Pengaruh fraud pentagon dan motivasi belajar terhadap kecurangan akademik. Neraca Akuntansi Manajemen, Ekonomi (MUSYTARI), 21(2), 1–12.

Pozzoli, M., Nastari, R., Pisano, S. And Venuti, M., 2023. How Circular Economy Disclosure Responds To Institutional Determinants Empirical Evidences In Non-Financial European Firms. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(22), Pp.1–20.

Kamaruzzaman, M., Ghani, E.K. And Rossli, M.A.H., 2021. Determinants Of Academic Fraud In Higher Education Institutions: A Fraud Triangle Perspective. Psychology And Education Journal, 58(2), Pp.3879–3892.

Persulessy, G., Mediaty, M. And Pontoh, G.T., 2022. Triangle’s Fraud Theory On Academic Fraud Behavior When Online Learning. International Journal Of Professional Business Review, 7(6), Pp.1–13.

Dias-Oliveira, E., Morais, C., Pasion, R. And Hodgson, J., 2024. “It Is No Big Deal!”: Fraud Diamond Theory As An Explanatory Model For Understanding Students’ Academic Fraudulent Behavior. Sage Open, 14(3), Pp.1–13.

Bawaneh, S.S., 2014. Information Security For Organizations And Accounting Information Systems A Jordan Banking Sector Case. International Review Of Management And Business Research, 3(2), Pp.1174–1189.

Goddard, A. Et Al., 2016. The Two Publics And Institutional Theory – A Study Of Public Sector Accounting In Tanzania. Critical Perspectives On Accounting, 40, Pp.8–25.

Apriani, U., 2020. Pengaruh Komponen-Komponen Fraud Star Terhadap Korupsi Dengan Sistem Pengendalian Intern Pemerintah (Spip) Sebagai Variabel Moderasi. Jurnal Magister Akuntansi Trisakti, 7(1), Pp.1–24.

Sari, D. E., Asila, N. F., Mustofa, R. H., Suranto, Jatmika, S., Ahmad, N. L., Setianingrum, S., & Fadhilah, R. (2025). Using the Fraud Triangle framework to explore the impact of information technology misuse on academic fraud in accounting education: evidence from Indonesia. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2476302. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2476302

Sofyani, H., Rozi, H. F., & Amalia, F. A. (2020). Tekanan Institusional dalam Praktik Tatakelola Badan Usaha Milik Desa (Bumdes). Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi, 4(2), 111–134. http://jurnal.ugj.ac.id/index.php/jka

Juliardi, D., Sudarto, T. A., & Taufiqi, R. A. (2021). Fraud triangle, misuse of information technology and student integrity toward the academic cheating of UM student during the pandemic Covid-19. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 10(6), 329–339. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i6.1343

Downloads

Published

2025-10-15

How to Cite

Diah Astuti, & Arief Rahman. (2025). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kecurangan di Perguruan Tinggi Swasta di Indonesia. AKUA: Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 4(4), 721–734. https://doi.org/10.54259/akua.v4i4.5663