![]() |
CORRECTION AND RETRACTION
This policy explains how Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi amends articles that have been published. It separates three actions:
- Correction repairs errors in an article that remains substantially reliable.
- Retraction warns readers that an article can no longer be relied on.
- Expression of concern alerts readers to a serious concern while it is being examined.
A request from the authors to remove a published article is assessed under this policy, and it is not granted automatically.
Summary of Actions
| Action | When it is used | What readers see |
|---|---|---|
| Correction | The article is substantially reliable, and it contains an error that can be repaired. | A dated correction notice that is linked to the original article. |
| Expression of concern | There is a serious concern, and the investigation has not been completed. | A dated notice that is linked to the article. |
| Retraction | The article can no longer be relied on, for example because of a serious error or serious misconduct. | A dated retraction notice, and a clear warning about the status of the article. |
Part A. Corrections
A1. When a correction is appropriate
| No. | Errors that can be corrected |
|---|---|
| 1 | Data, tables, figures, or supplementary files, including questionnaires, codebooks, interview guides, and other instruments. |
| 2 | Wrong names or affiliations of authors. |
| 3 | Funding, competing interest, or acknowledgment statements that are missing or incorrect. |
| 4 | Errors in references or in the attribution of sources. |
- A correction cannot be used to hide findings that are fundamentally unreliable.
- When a change would significantly alter the conclusions of the article, the journal first decides whether a correction is enough, or whether a different action is needed.
- Changes to the list of authors follow the policy on Authorship and Contributorship.
A2. Requesting and assessing a correction
- Authors and readers can request a correction by email to jurnal.mukasi@gmail.com.
- The request should give the DOI or the link of the article, the passage that is affected, the change that is proposed, and the reason for it.
- Authors who find a significant error in their own published work should inform the journal promptly.
| Step | Procedure |
|---|---|
| 1 | The responsible editor assesses the effect of the error. |
| 2 | The editor may ask the authors to respond, or may obtain independent advice. |
| 3 | When the request raises a wider concern about integrity, the case is handled under the Allegations of Misconduct policy. |
| 4 | The journal seeks the agreement of the authors, but it may make a necessary correction without it. |
A3. Correction notice
- The notice identifies the article, describes the error and how it was repaired, and explains any effect on the interpretation of the article. It may be called a corrigendum or an erratum.
- The notice is dated, is clearly labeled as a correction, is freely accessible, and is linked to the original article.
- Substantive changes are always disclosed, and they are never made silently.
- Minor typographical or technical repairs may instead be recorded as a version note or as an administrative update.
- When an author asks to change a name, the journal protects the privacy of the author and avoids unnecessary personal details in the notice.
A4. Implementation
- When the file of the article changes, the corrected version is published together with the correction notice.
- The change is recorded, so that readers can see what was changed and when.
- The DOI and the link of the article stay the same.
- Where it is needed, the journal updates the metadata of the article and informs the indexing services.
Part B. Retractions
B1. Grounds for consideration
A retraction may be considered in the situations below.
| No. | Ground |
|---|---|
| 1 | The findings are unreliable because of a major error, fabrication, falsification, or inappropriate analysis. |
| 2 | The article contains substantial plagiarism, or it is a redundant publication that was not disclosed. |
| 3 | There is a serious problem with the right of the authors to publish the work. |
| 4 | There was a serious ethical failure, for example research without the permission or the consent of participants that is required. |
| 5 | The assessment process of the article was compromised. |
| 6 | A major competing interest was not disclosed. |
An honest error can also justify a retraction when it undermines the findings. Proof of an intent to mislead is not always required.
B2. Safeguards for the decision
- An authorized editor who has no conflict of interest decides on a retraction, and the publisher carries out the decision.
- The evidence and the responses of the authors are reviewed under the Allegations of Misconduct policy.
- Allegations without support, authorship disputes alone, and problems that a correction can repair do not normally justify a retraction.
- Authors normally have a chance to respond, but their agreement is not required.
- The protection of readers is not delayed indefinitely.
B3. Retraction notice
A retraction notice must meet the requirements below.
- Identify the article and its DOI or link.
- Name the party that issued the retraction.
- Give the reasons, based on evidence.
- Separate what has been established from what remains unresolved.
- Use factual and proportionate wording, and not blame a whole group without evidence.
- Be dated, be freely accessible, be labeled as a retraction, and be linked permanently to the article.
B4. Handling of the published record
| Situation | What the journal does |
|---|---|
| Normal case | The retracted article stays available, with a clear warning about its status and a link to the retraction notice. It is not deleted. |
| Exceptional removal | The full text may be removed for legal reasons, or when there is a serious risk to the privacy or safety of participants, such as informants, minors, or users of social media. A notice stays in place to explain the removal. |
| Rights of readers | A retraction does not withdraw the license rights that were already granted, as stated on the Licensing page. |
Part C. Expressions of Concern
- An expression of concern is issued when a serious concern exists and the investigation has not been completed, or when the evidence points to a serious problem but is not yet conclusive.
- The notice is dated, is freely accessible, and is linked to the article.
- When the matter is resolved, the notice is replaced, or it is followed by a correction, by a retraction, or by a statement that the concern has been resolved.
- The handling follows the Allegations of Misconduct policy.
Comments from readers. A scholarly comment on a published article does not require a correction or a retraction. It can be made through the Post Publication Discussion page.
Enquiries and Related Policies
| Corrections and retractions | jurnal.mukasi@gmail.com | jurnal@yp3a.org |
| Ethics and integrity | Publication Ethics, Plagiarism Policy, Conflicts of Interest |
| Concerns about misconduct | Allegations of Misconduct |
| Authors and fees | Authorship and Contributorship and Author Fees |
| Rights and comments | Licensing and Post Publication Discussion |









