Analisis Metode Pengukuran Kualitas Perangkat Lunak: Sebuah Tinjauan Literatur Sistematis

Authors

  • Ahmad Farisi Universitas Multi Data Palembang
  • Dafid Dafid University of Multi Data Palembang
  • Rizani Teguh University of Multi Data Palembang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54259/satesi.v4i1.2551

Keywords:

McCall, Software Quality Measurement, Systematic Literature Review

Abstract

This research is a systematic literature review that analyzes software quality measurement methods used in some researches over the last 5 years. There are many software quality measurement methods such as Boehm, ServQual, FURPS, WebQual, ISO 9126, Delone & McLean, ISO 25010, SQL-OSS, ISO 25022, and McCall. This research finds out systematically about what methods have been used to measure software quality in the last 5 years, what types of software that are being measured, and what methods are considered best practice in measuring software quality. This research found 12 articles that used several methods such as the ISO/IEC 25010:2011 Model, Function Analysis, Metric Function Oriented, and McCall. Most research applies the McCall method in measuring software quality with the web-based information system software in the education sector as the research object. Therefore, the McCall method is considered best practice in measuring software quality. The McCall method measures software quality comprehensively in product revision aspects, product transition aspects, and product operation aspects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Dafid Dafid, University of Multi Data Palembang

Lecturer of Information System Study Pogram, Faculty of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Multi Data Palembang

Rizani Teguh, University of Multi Data Palembang

Lecturer of Information System Study Pogram, Faculty of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Multi Data Palembang

References

M. RICHARDS dan N. FORD, Fundamentals of Software Architecture An Engineering Approach, 1st Editio. California: O’Reilly Media, Inc., 2020.

L. López et al., “Quality measurement in agile and rapid software development: A systematic mapping,” J. Syst. Softw., vol. 186, hal. 111187, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2021.111187.

M. A. W. SAPUTRA, W. A. RIODITAMA, H. SETYOWATI, dan M. A. YAQIN, “Survei Teknik-Teknik Pengukuran Kualitas Perangkat Lunak,” Ilk. J. Comput. Sci. Appl. Informatics, vol. 3, no. 1, hal. 2715–2731, 2021.

M. HARUN, “EVALUASI KUALITAS PERANGKAT LUNAK PADA APLIKASI ZOOM CLOUD MEETINGS UNTUK PEMBELAJARAN ELEARNING,” J. AKRAB JUARA, vol. 5, no. 3, hal. 102–112, 2020.

A. FARISI, R. TEGUH, dan R. LESTARI, “Analisis Kualitas Sistem Informasi Haji Terpadu Menggunakan Metode McCall,” JOINTECS (Journal Inf. Technol. Comput. Sci., vol. 7, no. 2, hal. 83–92, 2022.

J. F. WIJAYA, E. SALSABIILA, dan S. R. WICAKSONO, “PENGUKURAN KUALITAS PERANGKAT LUNAK MENGGUNAKAN METODE FUNCTION ANALYSIS ( STUDI KASUS POINT OF SALES BUKUKAS ),” Indones. J. Intellect. Publ., vol. 2, no. 1, hal. 1–8, 2021.

F. R. HARIRI dan J. E. W. PRAKASA, “Pengukuran Kompleksitas Sistem E-Learning di UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang Menggunakan Metrik Function Oriented,” in Seminar Nasional Inovasi Teknologi, Kediri: UN PGRI Kediri, 2019, hal. 245–250.

S. Kraus, T. Clauss, M. Breier, J. Gast, A. Zardini, dan V. Tiberius, “The economics of COVID-19: initial empirical evidence on how family firms in five European countries cope with the corona crisis,” Int. J. Entrep. Behav. Res., vol. 26, no. 5, hal. 1067–1092, 2020, doi: 10.1108/IJEBR-04-2020-0214.

F. Rais, M. N. Ramadhani, M. Ubaidillah, J. Christian, dan A. Farisi, “ANALISIS METODE AUDIT INFRASTRUKT IT PADA BIDANG PENDIDIKAN, PEMERINTAHAN, DAN PERUSAHAAN: SEBUAH TINJAUAN LITERATUR SISTEMATIS,” J. Rekayasa Sist. Inf. dan Teknol., vol. 1, no. 3, hal. 18–27, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.59407/jrsit.v1i3.381.

K.-J. Stol dan B. Fitzgerald, “The ABC of Software Engineering Research,” ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol., vol. 27, no. 3, hal. 1–51, Jul 2018, doi: 10.1145/3241743.

R. S. PRESSMAN, Software Quality Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, Seventh Ed., vol. 9781118592. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2014. doi: 10.1002/9781118830208.

H. Panduwiyasa, M. Saputra, Z. F. Azzahra, dan A. R. Aniko, “Accounting and Smart System: Functional Evaluation of ISO/IEC 25010:2011 Quality Model (a Case Study),” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 1092, no. 1, hal. 012065, Mar 2021, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/1092/1/012065.

D. Galin, “Software Development and Quality Assurance Process Standards,” in Software Quality: Concepts and Practice, Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2018, hal. 563–584. doi: 10.1002/9781119134527.app1.

S. Elder, “Vulnerability Detection is Just the Beginning,” in 2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion), IEEE, Mei 2021, hal. 304–308. doi: 10.1109/ICSE-Companion52605.2021.00133.

S. Pizard, D. Vallespir, dan B. Kitchenham, “A longitudinal case study on the effects of an evidence-based software engineering training,” in Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 44th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training, New York, NY, USA: ACM, Mei 2022, hal. 1–13. doi: 10.1145/3510456.3514150.

J. P. Miguel, D. Mauricio, dan G. Rodríguez, “A REVIEW OF SOFTWARE QUALITY MODELS FOR THE EVALUATION OF SOFTWARE PRODUCTS,” Int. J. Softw. Eng. Appl., vol. 5, no. 6, hal. 32–54, 2014, doi: 10.5121/ijsea.2014.5603.

M. Donnelly dan E. P. White, “Assessing the Quality of a Local Authority Conference and Hospitality Venue Using the ServQual Model,” Nang Yan Bus. J., vol. 1, no. 1, hal. 15–20, 2014, doi: 10.2478/nybj-2014-0003.

S. Yadav, “Analysis and Assessment of Existing Software Quality Models to Predict the Reliability of Component-Based Software,” Int. J. Emerg. Trends Eng. Res., vol. 8, no. 6, hal. 2824–2840, 2020, doi: 10.30534/ijeter/2020/96862020.

S. Barnes dan R. Vidgen, “An Integrative Approach to the Assessment of E-Commerce Quality. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research,” J. Electron. Commer. Res., vol. 3, no. 3, hal. 114–127, 2002, [Daring]. Tersedia pada: http://web.csulb.edu/journals/jecr/issues/20023/paper2.pdf

A. Rai, S. S. Lang, dan R. B. Welker, “Assessing the validity of IS success models: An empirical test and theoretical analysis,” Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 13, no. 1, hal. 50–69, 2002, doi: 10.1287/isre.13.1.50.96.

H. Nakai, N. Tsuda, K. Honda, H. Washizaki, dan Y. Fukazawa, “Initial Framework for Software Quality Evaluation Based on ISO/IEC 25022 and ISO/IEC 25023,” Proc. - 2016 IEEE Int. Conf. Softw. Qual. Reliab. Secur. QRS-C 2016, hal. 410–411, 2016, doi: 10.1109/QRS-C.2016.66.

Barbara Kitchenham, “Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews,” Keele Univ. Tech. Rep., vol. 33, no. 2004, hal. 1–26, 2014, [Daring]. Tersedia pada: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228756057

A. FARISI dan H. SAPUTRA, “Analisis Kualitas Sistem Informasi Menggunakan Metode McCall : Studi Kasus SPON MDP,” Techno.COM, vol. 21, no. 2, hal. 237–248, 2022.

A. ANDRIANTI, “Pengukuran Kualitas Aplikasi Rekap Indikator Mutu Harian RS Bhayangkara Jambi Menggunakan Metode McCall,” J. Ilm. Media Sisfo, vol. 14, no. 1, hal. 24–34, 2020, doi: 10.33998/mediasisfo.2020.14.1.716.

A. ABIYOGA, W. WITANTI, dan A. K. NINGSIH, “Pengukuran Kualitas Perangkat Lunak Menggunakan Model McCall Pada Sistem Akademik Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani,” Informatics Digit. Expert, vol. 3, no. 2, hal. 69–74, 2021.

N. SYAHRANI dan FATMASARI, “Evaluasi Kualitas Sistem Informasi Akademik Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang Menggunakan Metode McCall,” Bina Darma Conf. Comput. Sci., vol. 4, no. 3, 2022.

F. SULAIMAN, N. SUARNA, dan IIN, “Pengukuran Kualitas Perangkat Lunak Sistem Informasi Pengarsipan Dokumen Laporan Jalan Tol Menggunakan Metode Mccall,” INFOTECH J., vol. 8, no. 1, hal. 34–40, Mar 2022, doi: 10.31949/infotech.v8i1.2234.

MALAHAYATI dan E. NADEAK, “Implementasi Mc Call dalam Pengukuran Kualitas SIAKAD (Sistem Informasi Akademik),” Teknomatika, vol. 13, no. 01, hal. 63–69, 2023, [Daring]. Tersedia pada: http://ojs.palcomtech.ac.id/index.php/teknomatika/article/view/620

A. A. PRATIWI, B. A. WARDIJONO, dan E. HEGARINI, “Analisis Kualitas Website Sistem Informasi Akademik STMIK Jakarta STI&K Menggunakan Metode McCall,” J. SIKOMTEK, vol. 13, no. 2, hal. 1–6, 2023.

C. JULIANE, R. DZULKARNAEN, dan W. SUSANTI, “Metode McCall ’ s untuk Pengujian Kualitas Sistem Informasi Administrasi Tugas Akhir (SIATA),” J. RESTI, vol. 3, no. 3, hal. 488–495, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.29207/resti.v3i3.1170.

F. S. AL-OBTHANI dan A. A. AMEEN, “Towards Customized Smart Government Quality Model,” Int. J. Softw. Eng. Appl., vol. 9, no. 2, hal. 41–50, 2018, doi: 10.5121/ijsea.2018.9204.

Y. ANDRIYANI, J. A. DEWANA, dan I. DAQIQIL, “Implementasi McCall’S Framework dalam Pengujian Kualitas Perangkat Lunak (Studi Kasus Portal Kuliah Kerja Nyata Universitas Riau),” J. Tek. Inform., vol. 13, no. 2, hal. 201–212, Feb 2021, doi: 10.15408/jti.v13i2.16986.

A. Mulyanto, “Pengujian Sistem Informasi Akademik Menggunakan Mccall’s Software Quality Framework,” JISKA (Jurnal Inform. Sunan Kalijaga), vol. 1, no. 1, hal. 47–57, 2016, doi: 10.14421/jiska.2016.11-07.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-28

How to Cite

Ahmad Farisi, Dafid, D., & Rizani Teguh. (2024). Analisis Metode Pengukuran Kualitas Perangkat Lunak: Sebuah Tinjauan Literatur Sistematis . SATESI: Jurnal Sains Teknologi Dan Sistem Informasi, 4(1), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.54259/satesi.v4i1.2551

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): April 2024

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Ahmad Farisi, Dafid Dafid, Rizani Teguh

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).