Fenomenologi Popularitas Organik Pengguna Non-Selebriti di Instagram

Authors

  • Adhvidya Adhvidya Universitas Pamulang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54259/mukasi.v5i1.6765

Keywords:

Communication Motives, Organic Popularity, Micro-Celebrity, Phenomenology

Abstract

This journal examines the process of forming popular accounts on Instagram, carried out by individuals from ordinary backgrounds rather than celebrities or public figures. The study employs a qualitative approach with a descriptive phenomenological method to gain an in-depth understanding of participants’ experiences. Three participants were selected through purposive sampling based on the criterion of owning accounts that had already gained wide recognition. The research aims to answer a fundamental question: what truly creates a popular account on Instagram? The analysis reveals that popularity does not necessarily stem from an explicit motive to become popular, but rather emerges as a consequence of consistent and authentic everyday practices. Four main strategies identified in this study are consistency in posting content, creating characteristic content, engaging in reposting practices, and meeting followers’ expectations. These findings contribute significantly to the field of digital communication studies and serve as practical references for Instagram users seeking to understand the dynamics of popularity without relying on instant strategies. Ultimately, the results not only provide empirical insights into how popular accounts are formed but also establish a conceptual foundation for next development of communication studies. In theoretical terms, this study expands the understanding of how digital identity, everyday practices, and social interactions intersect in shaping popularity within social media spaces.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abidin, C. (2015). Communicative intimacies: Influencers and perceived interconnectedness. Ada: A Journal of Gender, New Media, and Technology, 8.

Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2005). Business research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cai, Y., & Cude, B. J. (2008). Online shopping. In J. J. Xiao (Ed.), Handbook of consumer finance research (pp. 267–283). New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-75734-6_9

Cha, J. (2010). Factors affecting the frequency and amount of social networking site use: Motivations, structural attributes, and experiences. First Monday, 15(12). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v15i12.2889

Cheung, C. M. K., & Lee, M. K. O. (2014). Consumer engagement in social media brand communities: A literature review. International Journal of Information Management, 34(2), 280–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.10.007

Cole, S., Suman, M., Schramm, W., Zhou, L., & Salvador, G. (2018). World Internet Project report: 2018. Los Angeles, CA: USC Annenberg School Center for the Digital Future. Retrieved from https://www.digitalcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/World-Internet-Project-report-2018.pdf

Colaizzi, P. F. (1978). Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In R. S. Valle & M. King (Eds.), Existential-phenomenological alternatives for psychology (pp. 48–71). New York: Oxford University Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Cunningham, C. (Ed.). (2013). Social networking and impression management: Self-presentation in the digital age. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books/Rowman & Littlefield.

Dateling, N., & Bick, G. (2013). The impact of social media on marketing communication. Journal of Marketing Development and Competitiveness, 7(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5176/2251-2098_EMG13.13

Friedman, H. L. (1979). The use of celebrities in advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 6(3), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1086/208745

Gülnar, B., & Balcı, Ş. (2010). Motivations of Facebook, YouTube and similar web sites users. Journal of Yaşar University, 17(5), 2824–2838.

Hampton, K. N., Goulet, L. S., Rainie, L., & Purcell, K. (2012). Social networking sites and our lives. Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project. http://pewrsr.ch/1m8gWlz

Haryanto, A. T. (2024, January 31). APJII: Jumlah pengguna internet Indonesia tembus 221 juta orang. Detikinet. https://inet.detik.com/cyberlife/d-7169749/apjii-jumlah-pengguna-internet-indonesia-tembus-221-juta-orang

Hawley, P. H. (1999). The ontogenesis of social dominance: A strategy-based evolutionary perspective. Developmental Review, 19(1), 97–132. https://doi.org/10.1006/drev.1998.0470

Hawley, P. H. (2003). Strategies of control, aggression, and morality in preschoolers: An evolutionary perspective. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 85(3), 213–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0965(03)00073-0

Hogan, B. (2010). The presentation of self in the age of social media: Distinguishing performances and exhibitions online. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30(6), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467610385893

Hu, Y., Manikonda, L., & Kambhampati, S. (2014). What we Instagram: A first analysis of Instagram photo content and user types. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 8(1), 595–598. https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/14578

Joinson, A. N. (2008). Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people? Motives and use of Facebook. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’08) (pp. 1027–1036). New York, NY: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357213

Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509–523. https://doi.org/10.1086/268109

Leung, L. (2009). User-generated content on the internet: An examination of gratifications, civic engagement and psychological empowerment. New Media & Society, 11(8), 1327–1347. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809341264

Marwick, A. E., & boyd, d. (2011). To see and be seen: Celebrity practice on Twitter. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 17(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856510394539

Morse, J. M., & Field, P. A. (1995). Qualitative research methods for health professionals (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Nardi, B. A., Schiano, D. J., Gumbrecht, M., & Swartz, L. (2004). Why we blog. Communications of the ACM, 47(12), 41–46. https://doi.org/10.1145/1035134.1035163

Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Harlow: Pearson.

Papacharissi, Z., & Rubin, A. M. (2000). Predictors of internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(2), 175–196. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15506878JOBEM4402_2

Pempek, T. A., Yermolayeva, Y. A., & Calvert, S. L. (2009). College students’ social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(3), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2008.12.010

Pettijohn II, T. F., LaPiene, K. E., Pettijohn, T. F., & Horting, A. L. (2012). Relationships between Facebook intensity, friendship contingent self-esteem, and personality in U.S. college students. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 6(1), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2012-1-2

Quan-Haase, A., & Young, A. L. (2010). Uses and gratifications of social media: A comparison of Facebook and instant messaging. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30(5), 350–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467610380009

Rose, P., Beeby, J., & Parker, D. (1995). Academic rigour in the lived experience of researchers using phenomenological methods in nursing. In H. J. Streubert & D. R. Carpenter (Eds.), Qualitative research in nursing: Advancing the humanistic imperative (pp. 173–186). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott.

Rubin, A. M. (2009). Uses-and-gratifications perspective on media effects. In J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 165–184). Routledge.

Sheldon, P. (2008). The relationship between unwillingness-to-communicate and students’ Facebook use. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 20(2), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105.20.2.67

Schlecht, C. (2003). Celebrities’ impact on branding. Columbia, NY: Columbia Business School, Center on Global Brand Leadership.

Scolari, C. A. (2009). Mapping conversations about new media: The theoretical field of digital communication. New Media & Society, 11(6), 943–964. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809336513

Soegiyono, S. (2007). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Spiegelberg, H. (1978). The phenomenological movement: A historical introduction (3rd ed.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

Streubert, H. J., & Carpenter, D. R. (2003). Qualitative research in nursing: Advancing the humanistic imperative (3rd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Sundar, S. S., & Limperos, A. M. (2013). Uses and grats 2.0: New gratifications for new media. Journal of Communication, 63(3), 393–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2013.845827

Urista, M. A., Dong, Q., & Day, K. D. (2009). Explaining why young adults use MySpace and Facebook through uses and gratifications theory. Human Communication, 12(2), 215–229.

Woolley, K., & Fishbach, A. (2015). The experience matters more than you think: People value intrinsic incentives more inside than outside an activity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(6), 968–982. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000035

Downloads

Published

2026-02-15

How to Cite

Adhvidya, A. (2026). Fenomenologi Popularitas Organik Pengguna Non-Selebriti di Instagram. MUKASI: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 5(1), 314–328. https://doi.org/10.54259/mukasi.v5i1.6765