Studi Komparasi Kualitas Hidup dan Kinerja pada Karyawan dengan Model Kerja Hybrid dan Full-Remote di Yayasan XYZ Jakarta Selatan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54259/sehatrakyat.v4i1.4113Keywords:
Quality of Life, Work Performance, Full-Remote, Hybrid, XYZ FoundationAbstract
The advancement of information and communication technology, along with post-pandemic changes, has transformed global work structures. Full-remote and hybrid work models remain widely implemented, offering both conveniences and challenges for employees. This study compares the quality of life and performance of full-remote and hybrid employees at Yayasan XYZ, South Jakarta. Using a quantitative method with a cross-sectional design, data were collected from 48 purposively sampled employees via questionnaires. The research results indicate that, based on the average scores obtained, full-remote employees exhibit a higher quality of life in the physical, psychological, and environmental domains, whereas hybrid employees excel in the social domain. The comparative analysis of quality of life revealed no significant differences between these two work models. In terms of performance, hybrid employees demonstrated higher productivity levels than full-remote employees, with an average score of 9.22 for full-remote and 9.64 for hybrid work models. However, the comparative analysis of performance also indicated no statistically significant differences between the two models. In conclusion, while there are variations in the experiences of employees working under full-remote and hybrid models, the comparative analysis confirms that there are no significant differences in terms of quality of life and performance between these two work models. The results of this study are expected to serve as a basis for Yayasan XYZ in formulating optimal work model policies to ensure employee well-being and productivity
Downloads
References
Angesti, N. G., Azalia, A. B., Sebastian, M., Wijaya, N., Lie, D., & Pribadi, R. B. (2022). A Descriptive Study of Digital Stress among Employees Who Adopt a Hybrid Working System at PT.XYZ. Psychosophia: Journal of Psychology, Religion, and Humanity, 4(2), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.32923/psc.v4i2.2704
Arsyam, M., & Tahir, M. Y. (2021). Ragam Jenis Penelitian dan Perspektif. Al-Ubudiyah: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Studi Islam, 2(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.55623/au.v2i1.17
Chudzicka-Czupała, A., Żywiołek-Szeja, M., Paliga, M., Grabowski, D., & Krauze, N. (2023). Remote and on-Site Work Stress Severity During the Covid-19 Pandemic: Comparison and Selected Conditions. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, 36(1), 96–111. https://doi.org/10.13075/ijomeh.1896.02001
Dávila Morán, R. C. (2023). Influence of Remote Work on the Work Stress of Workers in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612489
Geldart, S. (2022). Remote Work in a Changing World: A Nod to Personal Space, Self-Regulation and Other Health and Wellness Strategies. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084873
Gratton, L., & Review, H. B. (2022). How To Do Hybrid Right. Harvard Business Review.
Hidayatullah, A., Tjahjawati, & Sri, S. (2018). Pengaruh Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja Terhadap Produktivitas Kerja Karyawan. Jurnal Riset Bisnis dan Investasi, 3(2), 104. https://doi.org/10.35697/jrbi.v3i2.938
Khan Mohmand, S. (2019). Research Instruments. In Crafty Oligarchs, Savvy Voters. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108694247.012
Koopmans, L. (2014). Measuring individual work performance. In Measuring Individual Work Performance.
Koopmans, L., Bernaards, C., Hildebrandt, V., Van Buuren, S., Van Der Beek, A. J., & de Vet, H. C. w. (2012). Development of an individual work performance questionnaire. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 62(1), 6–28. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410401311285273
Koopmans, L., Bernaards, C. M., Hildebrandt, V. H., De Vet, H. C. W., & Van Der Beek, A. J. (2014). Measuring individual work performance: Identifying and selecting indicators. Article Journal in Work, 48(2), 229–238. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-131659
Kortsch, T., Rehwaldt, R., Schwake, M. E., & Licari, C. (2022). Does Remote Work Make People Happy? Effects of Flexibilization of Work Location and Working Hours on Happiness at Work and Affective Commitment in the German Banking Sector. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159117
Kumari, N. (2023). A review of literature on employee wellbeing in hybrid and remote workplace. International Journal of Research in Human Resource Management, 5(1), 68–71. https://doi.org/10.33545/26633213.2023.v5.i1a.132
Lauring, J., & Jonasson, C. (2024). What is hybrid work? Towards greater conceptual clarity of a common term and understanding its consequences. Human Resource Management Review, 35(August 2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2024.101044
Leng, C. H., Tsai, C. S., Chan, T. C., & Lee, H. W. (2023). Quality of life in multiple scenarios: The impact of work mode and social contact quantity. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1018415
Liu, H., Gan, Q., Tan, J., Sun, X., Liu, Y., & Wan, C. (2023). The association between quality of life and subjective wellbeing among older adults based on canonical correlation analysis. Frontiers in Public Health, 11(September), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1235276
Mariniello, M., Grzegorczyk, M., Nurski, L., & Schraepen, T. (2021). Blending the physical and virtual: a hybrid model for the future of work, Policy Contribution 14/2021. June, 1–22. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2021/05/08/the-porto-declaration/.
Mustajab, D. (2024). Exploring the Effectiveness of Remote and Hybrid Work Policies: A Literature Review on Workforce Management Practices. In Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis (Vol. 11, Nomor 2, hal. 891–908). https://doi.org/10.33096/jmb.v11i2.798
Novianti, L. (2024). Analisis Teoritis Tren Work From Home di Era Digital: Kelebihan dan Kekurangan (hal. Vol.4 No. 1).
Oakman, J., Kinsman, N., Stuckey, R., Graham, M., & Weale, V. (2020). A rapid review of mental and physical health effects of working at home: how do we optimise health? BMC Public Health, 20(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09875-z
Pangestu, R. N., Rani, D. S., Tyas, T. S. N., & Farhah, Z. (2022). Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kinerja Karyawan: Perencanaan , Kualitas dan Kepemimpinan (Literature Review Manajemen Kinerja). Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Terapan, 4(2), 215–228.
Safira, N. A., Hanami, Y., & Batubara, M. (2023). Gambaran Multidimensional Well-Being pada Pekerja Remote : Studi Kualitatif Komparasi pada Pekerja Full-Remote dan Hybrid. Jurnal Magister Psikologi UMA, 15(2), 89–100.
Sakip, S. R. M., Zukri, A. Z. M., & Rahim, P. R. M. A. (2023). Assessing the Relationship Between Environmental, Psychological, Physical and Social Towards the Quality of Life. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, 14(2), 256–265. https://doi.org/10.30880/ijscet.2023.14.02.027
Shimura, A., Yokoi, K., Ishibashi, Y., Akatsuka, Y., & Inoue, T. (2021). Remote Work Decreases Psychological and Physical Stress Responses, but Full-Remote Work Increases Presenteeism. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(September), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.730969
Van Zoonen, W., & Sivunen, A. E. (2022). The impact of remote work and mediated communication frequency on isolation and psychological distress. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 31(4), 610–621. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2021.2002299
Wang, B., Liu, Y., Qian, J., & Parker, S. K. (2021). Achieving Effective Remote Working During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Work Design Perspective. In Applied Psychology (Vol. 70, Nomor 1). https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12290
WHO. (1996). WHOQOL-BREF : introduction, administration, scoring and generic version of the assessment : field trial version, December. In World Health Organization (hal. 1–16).
Widyastuti, T., & Hidayat, R. (2018). Adaptation of Individual Work Performance Questionnaire (IWPQ) into Bahasa Indonesia. International Journal of Research Studies in Psychology, 7(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrsp.2018.3020
Wontorczyk, A., & Rożnowski, B. (2022). Remote, Hybrid, and On-Site Work during the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic and the Consequences for Stress and Work Engagement. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042400
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Fenti Cahyani, Desyawati Utami, Izzatu Millah, Mugi Wahidin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Hak cipta pada setiap artikel adalah milik penulis.
Penulis mengakui bahwa SEHATRAKYAT (Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat) sebagai publisher yang mempublikasikan pertama kali dengan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Penulis dapat memasukan tulisan secara terpisah, mengatur distribusi non-ekskulif dari naskah yang telah terbit di jurnal ini kedalam versi yang lain, seperti: dikirim ke respository institusi penulis, publikasi kedalam buku, dan lain-lain. Dengan mengakui bahwa naskah telah terbit pertama kali pada SEHATRAKYAT (Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat).
