 |
POST-PUBLICATION DISCUSSION
How to discuss an article that Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan has published
Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan (AKUA) welcomes scholarly discussion of its published articles when the discussion is based on evidence. Contributions are sent to the editorial office, which handles them as described on this page.
Send a comment to
The editorial office, jurnal.akua@gmail.com
Subject line
Scholarly Comment, followed by the title of the article and its DOI
Language
Indonesian or English
Status of a comment
Not presented as having passed standard peer review
1. Post Publication Discussion
Valuable contributions include the following.
Questions about the method of a studyAlternative interpretations of the findingsResults of replications in other organizations, sectors, or regionsComments on the use of the findings in the practice of accounting and financeOther substantive observations
2. Choosing the Right Route
| What you want to do | Where to go |
|---|---|
| Comment on the method, the analysis, or the interpretation of a published article, or report the results of a replication | This page. |
| Point out an error that needs to be corrected in a published article | Correction and Retraction |
| Report suspected plagiarism, fabrication, or another form of misconduct | Allegations of Misconduct |
| Submit new research in response to a published article | Author Guidelines and Peer Review Process |
3. Submitting a Scholarly Comment
◆ 3.1 How to submit
◆ 3.2 What a comment must contain
1
The title and the DOI of the article that is discussed.
2
The specific issue that is raised.
3
The reasoning or the evidence that supports the comment.
4
The relevant references.
5
Any competing interests, as described in the Conflicts of Interest policy.
◆ 3.3 Standards for comments
1
Keep the comment concise, so that it can be assessed with a clear focus.
2
Criticism must concern the work and not the personal characteristics of the authors.
3
Separate clearly what has been shown to be an error, what is still an open question, and what is only a difference of interpretation.
4
Leave out confidential information, and information that identifies participants or organizations, unless it is really needed.
4. Editorial Consideration and Author Response
1
A comment is sent to the editorial office
2
The editors assess the comment
3
The authors of the article may be invited to respond
4
An approved comment or reply is labeled and linked to the article
◆ 4.1 Editorial assessment
◆
The editors assess the relevance of the comment, its clarity, its evidence, and its contribution to the understanding of the article.
◆
The authors of the article may be invited to respond.
◆
The editors may ask independent specialists for advice when this is needed.
◆
The right of the authors to respond does not allow them to decide whether valid criticism is considered.
◆ 4.2 Scope of publication
◆
Disagreement with an article does not automatically lead to the publication of a comment.
◆
A concern that was raised on an external scholarly platform may be examined once it has been brought to the attention of the journal.
◆
A person who reports a credible concern about integrity does not need to have a comment published before the concern is assessed.
5. Publication and Assessment Status
Not standard peer review
Correspondence that the editors assess is not presented as having passed the standard peer review of the journal.
◆
An approved comment or reply is clearly labeled and is linked to the article that it discusses.
◆
A contribution that is submitted as a new research article follows the Peer Review Process.
◆
The journal does not promise the automatic publication of a comment, or a fixed time of publication.
◆
This procedure does not limit lawful public criticism of the articles of the journal. It also does not limit the reuse of articles that are published under the CC BY 4.0 license outside the journal, as described on the Licensing page.
6. Related Policies and Enquiries
| Topic | Page |
|---|---|
| Suspected misconduct | Allegations of Misconduct |
| Errors that require a change to the published record | Correction and Retraction |
| General standards of conduct | Publication Ethics |
Send a comment or ask a question
Write to the AKUA editorial office at jurnal.akua@gmail.com. For a comment, use the subject line Scholarly Comment: [Article Title and DOI].
Correction and RetractionAllegations of MisconductPublication Ethics
