Keadilan Distributif dan Prosedural: Kunci Kepuasan Kerja dalam Arsitektur Remunerasi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54259/akua.v5i3.7291Keywords:
Distributive Justice, Procedural Justice, Job Satisfaction, RemunerationAbstract
This study aims to analyze the influence of distributive justice and procedural justice on job satisfaction of UIN Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten employees in the Public Service Agency (BLU) remuneration scheme. Using a quantitative approach, a sample of 83 employees was purposively selected. The research instrument adopted the Colquitt scale and organizational behavior indicators with a Likert scale of 1–5. Data quality testing results showed all items were valid and reliable. The classical assumption test was met without multicollinearity or heteroscedasticity constraints. Multiple linear regression analysis produced the equation: Y = 19.966 + 0.215X1 + 0.202X2. Partially, both variables had a significant effect (p < 0.05). Simultaneously, the model proved significant (F = 8.135; p = 0.001) with an R2 value of 0.169, indicating a 16.9% contribution of the justice variable to job satisfaction. These findings confirm that job satisfaction is influenced by outcome justice (performance-based remuneration) and process justice (transparency and consistency of rules). Managerial recommendations include strengthening two-way communication, ensuring accurate performance data, and fostering participatory policy correction mechanisms. This research expands the literature on organizational justice at State Islamic Religious Universities (PTKIN) and provides direction for further research.
Downloads
References
M. P. Bertone and S. Witter, “The complex remuneration of human resources for health in low-income settings: policy implications and a research agenda for designing effective financial incentives,” Hum. Resour. Health, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 62, 2015, doi: 10.1186/s12960-015-0058-7.
A. C. Dowd and V. P. Tong, “Accountability, Assessment, and the Scholarship of ‘Best Practice’ BT - Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research,” J. C. Smart, Ed., Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2007, pp. 57–119. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-5666-6_2.
J. Abeler, S. Altmann, S. J. Goerg, S. Kube, and M. Wibral, “Equity and efficiency in multi-worker firms: Insights from experimental economics,” Anal. und Krit., vol. 2011, no. 1, pp. 325–348, 2011, doi: 10.1515/auk-2011-0122.
I. M. Jawahar and T. H. Stone, “Fairness perceptions and satisfaction with components of pay satisfaction,” J. Manag. Psychol., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 297–312, 2011, doi: 10.1108/02683941111124836.
R. Cropanzano, C. A. Prehar, and P. Y. Chen, “Using social exchange theory to distinguish procedural from interactional justice,” Gr. Organ. Manag., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 324–351, 2002, doi: 10.1177/1059601102027003002.
Leventhal GS., “What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships.,” Soc. Exch. Adv. theory Res., pp. 27–55, 1980.
J. A. Colquitt, “On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure,” J. Appl. Psychol., vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 386–400, 2001, doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.386.
G. A. Caldeira, J. Thibaut, L. Walker, and S. S. Nagel, “Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis,” West. Polit. Q., vol. 29, no. 4, p. 654, 1976, doi: 10.2307/448155.
J. Biehn, “Remuneration: looking for a better way.,” Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, vol. 48. Canada, p. 686, Apr. 2002.
H.-J. Bullinger and W. Menrad, “Changes in remuneration practice in production: Success factors of sustainable remuneration systems for innovative concepts of work organization,” Int. J. Prod. Res., vol. 40, no. 15, pp. 3955–3971, Jan. 2002, doi: 10.1080/00207540210150652.
M. Magnan and D. Martin, “Executive Compensation and Employee Remuneration: The Flexible Principles of Justice in Pay,” J. Bus. Ethics, vol. 160, no. 1, pp. 89–105, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10551-018-3786-5.
Y. Ma, S. Li, and S. Huang, “Digital transformation and enterprise external pay gap: Internal mechanism and empirical evidence,” Financ. Res. Lett., vol. 69, p. 106296, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2024.106296.
I. A. Richards, Practical Criticism: a Study of Literary Judgment, vol. 125, no. 3148. Routledge, 1930. doi: 10.1038/125304b0.
R. Folger and R. Cropanzano, “Organizational Justice and Human Resource Management,” Organ. Justice Hum. Resour. Manag., 2012, doi: 10.4135/9781452225777.
J. S. Adams, “Inequity In Social Exchange,” Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol., vol. 2, no. C, pp. 267–299, 1965, doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60108-2.
E. A. Lind and T. R. Tyler, “Procedural Justice in Law I,” 1988, pp. 61–92. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4899-2115-4_4.
Y. Cohen-Charash and P. E. Spector, “The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis,” Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process., vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 278–321, 2001, doi: 10.1006/obhd.2001.2958.
S. Akunto, “Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktek Praktek,” Rineka Cipta, vol. 2006, no. 2006, p. 197, 2002.
Sudjana, “Metode Statistika, Tarsito,” 2016.
T. A. J. Robbins Stephen P, Organizational Behavior. 15th Edition, Pearson Printice All. Pearson Prentice Hall, 2013.
I. Ghozali, “Aplikasi analisis multivariete dengan program IBM SPSS 23,” 2016.
H. Glejser, “A New Test for Heteroskedasticity,” J. Am. Stat. Assoc., vol. 64, no. 325, pp. 316–323, Mar. 1969, doi: 10.1080/01621459.1969.10500976.
R. Kurniawan, Analisis Regresi. Kencana Prenada Media, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=KcY-DwAAQBAJ
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sanawi Sanawi, Ilham Hibatullah, Muhamad Lulu Kamaludin, Trisna Taufik Darmawansyah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Hak cipta pada setiap artikel adalah milik penulis.
Penulis mengakui bahwa AKUA (Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan) sebagai publisher yang mempublikasikan pertama kali dengan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Penulis dapat memasukan tulisan secara terpisah, mengatur distribusi non-ekskulif dari naskah yang telah terbit di jurnal ini kedalam versi yang lain, seperti: dikirim ke respository institusi penulis, publikasi kedalam buku, dan lain-lain. Dengan mengakui bahwa naskah telah terbit pertama kali pada AKUA (Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan).
