Personalized Learning untuk Generasi Z: Peluang dan Tantangan

Authors

  • Ruri Keristanti Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara
  • Wahyuni Juliani Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara
  • Muhammad Arifin Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54259/diajar.v4i3.4419

Keywords:

Generation Z, Opportunities , Personalized Learning , Challenges

Abstract

The rapid technological changes in the 21st century have influenced how individuals learn, particularly among Generation Z, who have grown up as digital natives. This generation possesses unique characteristics such as dependence on technology, a desire for learning autonomy, and a tendency toward visual and interactive learning. These traits demand a more flexible, adaptive, and personalized educational approach. Personalized learning is considered one method capable of addressing these needs. The aim of this study is to explore the opportunities and challenges of implementing personalized learning for Generation Z. The research employed a qualitative methodology. To achieve this, a qualitative research approach was used, drawing data from various relevant literature sources. The Miles and Huberman model was applied as the data analysis methodology, which includes the processes of data reduction, data presentation, and drawing comprehensive conclusions. The results of the study indicate that personalized learning can enhance student motivation, engagement, and learning outcomes through the use of technology such as adaptive learning systems, digital platforms, and artificial intelligence. Additionally, personalized learning fosters the development of 21st-century skills such as independence, digital literacy, and problem-solving. However, challenges such as the digital divide, teacher readiness, and limitations of the national curriculum remain critical issues to be addressed. This study recommends strategies such as integrating technology and providing teacher training as initial steps toward the effective implementation of personalized learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

L. S. Pane, J. F., Steiner, E. D., Baird, M. D., & Hamilton, Continued progress: Promising evidence on personalized learning. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation, 2017.

C. L. Hwang, G. J., Wang, S. Y., & Lai, “). Effects of a social regulation-based online learning framework on students’ learning achievements and behaviors in mathematics,” Comput. Educ., vol. 160, no. 104031, 2020.

C. C. Xie, H., Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., & Wang, “Trends and development in technology-enhanced adaptive/personalized learning: A systematic review of journal publications from 2007 to 2017,” Comput. Educ., vol. 140, no. 103599, 2019.

Z. Molnar, G., Kismihok, G., Toth, E., & Namestovski, “The impact of modern technologies on mathematics achievement in European countries,” Interact. Learn. Environ., vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 1249–1264, 2021.

C. Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Boston: Center for Curriculum Redesign, 2019.

R. J. Marzano, The new art and science of teaching. Bloomington: Solution Tree Press, 2017.

C. A. Tomlinson, The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Alexandria: ASCD, 2014.

I. Prasetia, Metodologi Penelitian (Pendekatan Teori dan Praktik), 1st ed. Medan: UMSU Press, 2022.

M. N. Adlini, A. H. Dinda, S. Yulinda, O. Chotimah, and S. J. Merliyana, “Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Studi Pustaka,” Edumaspul J. Pendidik., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 974–980, 2022, doi: 10.33487/edumaspul.v6i1.3394.

A. H. Wanto, “Strategi Pemerintah Kota Malang dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Pelayanan Publik Berbasi Konsep Smart City,” J. Public Sect. Innov, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 39–43, 2017, doi: 10.26740/jpsi.v2n1.p39-43.

Y. S. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage Publications, 1994.

Mufdalifah, “PERSONALIZED LEARNING DAN MULTIMEDIA BERBASIS KOMPUTER MASIH PERLUKAH GURU ? Mufdalifah SMAN 2 Sampang JL . Mangkubumi 36 Sampang , Madura Jawa Timur 69215 PERSONALIZED LEARNING AND MULTIMEDIA BASED ON COMPUTER IS TEACHER STILL NEEDED ? multimedia,” J. Inov. dan Teknol. Pembelajaran, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 50–57, 2014.

L. S. Pane, J. F., Steiner, E. D., Baird, M. D., & Hamilton, Continued Progress: Promising Evidence on Personalized Learning. RAND Corporation, 2015.

M. Ishak, “Gen z dalam dunia pendidikan,” Strateg. Pemerintah Kota Malang dalam Meningkat. Kualitas Pelayanan Publik Berbasi Konsep Smart City, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 328–338, 2025.

S. Posnick-Goodwin, “Meet Genetaion Z,” CTA Mag., vol. 14, no. 5, 2010.

M. & Company, “True Gen: Generation Z and its implications for companies. McKinsey & Company.” [Online]. Available: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/consumer-packaged-goods/our-insights/true-gen-generation-z-and-its-implications-for-companies

H. Poll, “Gen Z lebih dari sekadar label: 63% generasi ini terlibat aktivitas kreatif dan out of the box. Radar Lawu.” [Online]. Available: https://radarlawu.jawapos.com/lifestyle/2205334497/gen-z-lebih-dari-sekedar-label-survei-harris-poll-63-persen-generasi-ini-terlibat-aktivitas-kreatif-dan-out-of-the-box-simak-keunggulan-mereka

G. Sakitri, “Selamat Datang Gen Z, Sang Penggerak Inovasi!,” Forum Manaj., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 1–10, 2021.

E. Ni and mah Hayati, “Karakteristik Belajar Generasi Z Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Desain Pembelajaran Ips,” vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 4–8, 2024, doi: 10.17977/um065.v4.i8.2024.8.

E. L. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, “Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions,” Contemp. Educ. Psychol., vol. 61, no. 101860, 2020.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-10

How to Cite

Ruri Keristanti, Wahyuni Juliani, & Muhammad Arifin. (2025). Personalized Learning untuk Generasi Z: Peluang dan Tantangan. DIAJAR: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 4(3), 411–417. https://doi.org/10.54259/diajar.v4i3.4419

Issue

Section

Articles