Komparasi Efektivitas Microlearning Berbasis Tiktok dengan Metode Pembelajaran Lecturing dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris

Authors

  • Ni Made Sri Rahayu Institut Pariwisata dan Bisnis Internasional
  • Ni Luh Supartini - Institut Pariwisata dan Bisnis Internasional

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54259/diajar.v4i4.5604

Keywords:

Microlearning , Tiktok , Lecturing Method , English Learning , Hospitality Education

Abstract

This study aims to compare the effectiveness of TikTok-based microlearning with the lecturing method in English learning for 3rd semester students of the Diploma III Hospitality program at the Institute of Tourism and International Business. The purpose of this research is to overcome the challenges of low motivation to learn and vocabulary mastery in conventional English learning, especially in Generation Z students who are familiar with digital technology. By utilizing the TikTok as a microlearning, this study explores a short and contextual video content can significantly improve learning outcomes compared to traditional lecture methods. The study used a quasi-experimental design with 60 students divided into an experimental group (TikTok) and a control group (lecturing). The intervention was carried out for six weeks with English material for hospitality. Data were collected through pre-tests and post-tests of vocabulary mastery, speech ability assessments, learning motivation questionnaires (ARCS model), and participatory observation. The results showed that the experimental group experienced a significant increase in vocabulary mastery (28%,p < 0.001) and learning motivation (35%, p < 0.001) compared to the control group (15% and 12%). However, no significant differences were found in speaking ability (p=0.12), suggesting that microlearning needs to be combined with active exercise for productive skills. Research limitations include short duration, samples from one institution, and non-randomized assignments. Nonetheless, these findings support the integration of TikTok-based microlearning as an effective additional learning tool in improving vocabulary retention and student engagement in vocational education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

M. Alshehri, "Using TikTok for English language learning: A case study of Saudi students," J. Educ. Technol. Soc., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 112–123, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.2307/jeductechsoci.25.1.112

W. M. Al-Rahmi, A. M. Zeki, M. Al-Emran, and A. O. Al-Laith, "TikTok in education: A systematic review," Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn., vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 4–18, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i12.14585

C. C. Bonwell and J. A. Eison, Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. Washington, DC: George Washington University, 1991.

P. Cohen, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.

J. C. Creswell and J. D. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 6th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2023.

R. F. DeVellis, Scale Development: Theory and Applications, 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2021.

Y. C. Hsu and Y. H. Ching, "Microlearning in the digital age: A review of the literature," TechTrends, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 405–413, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00388-4

T. Hug, "Microlearning: A strategy for ongoing professional development," in Proc. 2nd Microlearning Conf., Innsbruck, Austria, 2007, pp. 1–11.

M. K. Johnson, "The impact of short-form video on student engagement in higher education," J. Comput. High. Educ., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 245–261, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-022-09355-8

J. M. Keller, "Motivational design for learning and performance: The ARCS model approach," Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 275–296, 2010. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-008-9102-z

J. M. Keller, "The ARCS model of motivational design," in Instructional Design Theories and Models: An Overview of Their Current Status, C. M. Reigeluth, Ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1987, pp. 307–334.

L. Vygotsky, Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.

G. Liu, X. Chen, and Y. Wang, "Social media as a language learning tool: Exploring TikTok for ESL learners," Lang. Learn. Technol., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 45–62, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10125/73125

D. Merrill, "First principles of instruction," Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 43–59, 2002. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02505024

I. S. P. Nation, Learning Vocabulary in Another Language, 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2013.

M. Prensky, "Digital natives, digital immigrants," On the Horizon, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 1–6, 2001. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816

J. C. Richards, Teaching Listening and Speaking: From Theory to Practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2008.

R. M. Ryan and E. L. Deci, "Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being," Am. Psychol., vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 68–78, 2000. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

C. Seemiller and M. Grace, Generation Z Goes to College. Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass, 2016.

J. Sweller, "Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning," Cogn. Sci., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 257–285, 1988. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4

UNESCO, "Guidelines for the use of social media in education," 2022. [Online]. Available: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000382356

X. Wang, Y. Wu, and M. Zhou, "TikTok and education: Opportunities and challenges," J. Interact. Media Educ., vol. 2021, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.607

A. Paivio, Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1986.

H. F. O'Neil, R. Wainess, and E. L. Baker, "Classification of self-regulation and motivation constructs," Appl. Meas. Educ., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 63–84, 2005. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324818ame1801_4

G. Siemens, "Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age," Int. J. Instr. Technol. Dist. Learn., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 3–10, 2005.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-15

How to Cite

Ni Made Sri Rahayu, & -, N. L. S. (2025). Komparasi Efektivitas Microlearning Berbasis Tiktok dengan Metode Pembelajaran Lecturing dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris. DIAJAR: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 4(4), 704–712. https://doi.org/10.54259/diajar.v4i4.5604

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 4 (2025): Oktober 2025

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Ni Made Sri Rahayu, Ni Luh Supartini -

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Hak cipta pada setiap artikel adalah milik penulis.
Penulis mengakui bahwa DIAJAR (Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran) sebagai publisher yang mempublikasikan pertama kali dengan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Penulis dapat memasukan tulisan secara terpisah, mengatur distribusi non-ekskulif dari naskah yang telah terbit di jurnal ini kedalam versi yang lain, seperti: dikirim ke respository institusi penulis, publikasi kedalam buku, dan lain-lain. Dengan mengakui bahwa naskah telah terbit pertama kali pada DIAJAR (Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran).