Takut Tambah Dewasa: Ilusi Kompetensi Mahasiswa Keguruan di Tengah Grade Inflation dan Ketergantungan terhadap AI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54259/diajar.v5i4.9003Keywords:
Grade Inflation, Ilusi Kompetensi, Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Offloading, Mahasiswa KeguruanAbstract
This study examines how pre-service teacher education students experience and make sense of an illusion of competence amid grade inflation and dependence on artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education. Using Reflexive Thematic Analysis (RTA), data were collected through semi-structured interviews with students who met the criteria of being active in a teaching program (minimum fifth semester), having informal teaching experience, and using AI regularly in academic work. Interviews were processed using intelligent verbatim and partial transcription before undergoing the six phases of RTA. Findings show that participants rarely gained deeper understanding or skill improvement from completing assignments, largely due to cognitive offloading to AI. Participants also perceived that high grades did not necessarily reflect genuine competence, a pattern linked to grade inflation driven by institutional accreditation pressures. This gap between academic achievement and felt competence generated anxiety about readiness to enter the teaching profession. The study contributes a novel integration of two previously separate phenomena, grade inflation and AI dependence, in explaining how illusions of competence are constructed among pre-service teachers.
Downloads
References
[1] S. Islam et al., “Career anxiety in the age of artificial intelligence: Survey data of university students in Bangladesh,” Data Br., vol. 67, p. 112924, 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2026.112924.
[2] Z. Yang, H. Deng, and N. Jiang, “The impact mechanism of artificial intelligence dependence on college students’ innovation capability: an empirical study from China,” Front. Psychol., vol. 16, no. December, pp. 1–17, 2025, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1732837.
[3] K. J. A. Catacutan, F. R. A. Maramag, M. A. Bartolome, R. M. Hiquiana, and M. J. Mendezabal, “Employability study of the business administration graduates of catholic educational institution,” Univers. J. Educ. Res., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 156–161, 2020, doi: 10.13189/ujer.2020.080119.
[4] A. P. & P. M. Chenicheri Sid Nair, “European Journal of Engineering Training effectiveness of engineering students : A case study,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 34:2, no. 23 Apr 2009, pp. 131–139, 2009.
[5] R. Bachan, “Grade inflation in UK higher education,” Stud. High. Educ., vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 1580–1600, 2015, doi: 10.1080/03075079.2015.1019450.
[6] M. Nordin, G. Heckley, and U. Gerdtham, “The impact of grade inflation on higher education enrolment and earnings,” Econ. Educ. Rev., vol. 73, no. January, p. 101936, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2019.101936.
[7] J. A. Pearce, “How employers can stanch the hemorrhaging of collegiate GPA credibility,” Bus. Horiz., vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 35–43, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2016.08.010.
[8] M. D. H. Rahiem, “Generative AI in higher education in Indonesia: Patterns of use and learning impact,” Soc. Sci. Humanit. Open, vol. 13, no. April 2025, p. 102672, 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.102672.
[9] J. Tian and R. Zhang, “Learners’ AI dependence and critical thinking: The psychological mechanism of fatigue and the social buffering role of AI literacy,” Acta Psychol. (Amst)., vol. 260, no. September, p. 105725, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105725.
[10] M. M. Mir et al., “AI Dependency and Cognitive Offloading in Students: Implications for Learning, Thinking, and Competence in the Digital Era,” Int. J. Spec. Educ., vol. 41, no. 6s, pp. 30–44, 2026.
[11] U. Halim, M. N. S. Ali, and S. M. Salleh, “Artificial intelligence use and digital educational practices: Differential effects on learning achievement and satisfaction among Indonesian university students,” Multidiscip. Sci. J., vol. 8, no. 10, 2026, doi: 10.31893/multiscience.2026809.
[12] G. D. C. Alcívar-junco, “The Impact of Arti fi cial Intelligence on the Academic Performance of University Students in,” Open Educ. Stud., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2026, doi: 10.1515/edu-2025-0116.
[13] E. Dağ, M. Nal, İ. Topuz, H. Kılınç, Y. Demir, and G. Bektaş, “Artificial intelligence perceptions and career anxiety among health sciences students,” Sci. Rep., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2026, doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-42030-z.
[14] N. Duan, L. Li, G. Lin, and H. Chen, “The impact of AI anxiety on career decisions of college students,” Sci. Rep., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2026, doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-37648-y.
[15] J. M. Rigby and I. Iacovides, Towards Better Reflexive Thematic Analysis in HCI: A Scoping Review of Practice at CHI, vol. 1, no. 1. Association for Computing Machinery, 2026. doi: 10.1145/3772318.3790417.
[16] K. Nichols and W. Mason, “Approaches to teaching thematic analysis in sociology,” in Teaching Research Methods in Sociology, no. 2, 2025, pp. 242–258. doi: 10.4337/9781035320226.00027.
[17] G. Terry and N. Hayfield, “Reflexive thematic analysis and men’s embodiment following injury or illness: A worked example,” Anat. Sci. Educ., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 181–189, 2026, doi: 10.1002/ase.70058.
[18] A. Skukauskaite, “Transparency in transcribing: Making visible theoretical bases impacting knowledge construction from open-ended interview records,” Forum Qual. Sozialforsch., vol. 13, no. 1, 2012.
[19] V. Braun and V. Clarke, Successful qualitative research: a practical guide for beginners. 2013.
[20] S. Abubakar, A. Jeilani, and M. Yusuf, “The role of over-reliance on AI in the negative consequences of student learning: The moderating effects of ethical concerns and institutional policies,” Cogent Educ., vol. 12, no. 1, p., 2025, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2025.2591503.
[21] A. Ternikov and M. Blyakher, “Grade inflation and grading process: does faculty workload matter?,” J. Appl. Res. High. Educ., vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 1937–1955, 2024, doi: 10.1108/JARHE-06-2023-0247.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 arrafa nayla alfaithy, agus fakhruddin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Hak cipta pada setiap artikel adalah milik penulis.
Penulis mengakui bahwa DIAJAR (Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran) sebagai publisher yang mempublikasikan pertama kali dengan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Penulis dapat memasukan tulisan secara terpisah, mengatur distribusi non-ekskulif dari naskah yang telah terbit di jurnal ini kedalam versi yang lain, seperti: dikirim ke respository institusi penulis, publikasi kedalam buku, dan lain-lain. Dengan mengakui bahwa naskah telah terbit pertama kali pada DIAJAR (Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran).
