Membaca Pola Kreativitas Matematis Siswa SD melalui Tugas Literasi-Numerasi Berbasis Masalah Terbuka

Authors

  • Isna Muhammad Fathoni Universitas Bani Saleh
  • Hadi Rohyana Universitas Bani Saleh
  • Ilham Jaya Universitas Bani Saleh
  • Rafi Ahmad Faiz Universitas Bani Saleh
  • Nuraini Hasanah Universitas Bani Saleh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54259/diajar.v5i4.9147

Keywords:

Mathematical Creative Thinking, Literacy and Numeracy, Urban Context, Elementary School, Open-Ended Problems

Abstract

Low literacy-numeracy achievements among Indonesian elementary students stem from rigid, single-answer procedural mathematics instruction. This study maps the hierarchical patterns of upper-grade elementary students' Grades IV–VI mathematical creative thinking processes through open-ended literacy-numeracy tasks embedded in urban contexts. A mixed-methods sequential exploratory design was employed. Qualitative subjects were selected via purposive sampling based on academic achievement levels high, medium, low, across SDN Margahayu XI and SD Islam Labschool Bani Saleh in Bekasi City, alongside 180 quantitative test participants chosen via cluster sampling. Thematic analysis and constant comparative method identified 4 levels of creative thinking: Level 0 Pre-Creative/Imitative at 35%, Level 1 Emerging/Fluency Emphasis at 25%, Level 2 Flexible Contextual at 22%, and Level 3 Original & Elaborative at 18%. Cross-tabulation indicated high achievers dominated Levels 2 and 3 (85%), medium achievers reached Levels 2 and 3 (35%), and low achievers attained Level 1 (30%). Instrument validation yielded Aiken's V of 0.86–0.92 and Cronbach's Alpha of 0.81–0.84 (very high). Goodness of Fit testing confirmed a theoretical model integrating 4 cognitive dimensions with 3 urban stimuli (Spatial-Urban Mobility, Socio-Economic Artifacts, Environmental Literacy). These findings highlight the necessity of transitioning from imitative reasoning to creative mathematically founded reasoning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] R. A. Beghetto and J. C. Kaufman, “Classroom creativity in education: Theory and practice,” Cambridge Journal of Education, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2016, doi: 10.1080/0305764X.2015.1133376.

[2] J. W. Creswell and V. L. Plano Clark, Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, 2018.

[3] I. M. Fathoni, S. Adawiyah, R. F. B. Permana, and I. Jaya, “Integrating large language model as an adaptive reading assistant to enhance reading literacy among fifth-grade elementary school students in Indonesia,” Bima Journal of Elementary Education, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 27–40, 2026.

[4] M. Guntur, S. Sahronih, N. I. S. Ningsih, and P. Windari, “The learning trajectory based on STEM of elementary school pupils’ in solving proportion material: Didactical design-research,” Participatory Educational Research, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 84–103, 2023, doi: 10.17275/per.23.90.10.6.

[5] Kemdikbudristek, Naskah Akademik Asesmen Nasional: Literasi dan Numerasi. Jakarta, Indonesia: Pusat Asesmen Pendidikan, Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan, 2022.

[6] D. Kusumawati, I. M. Fathoni, N. Nursofah, E. G. Laman, L. Judijanto, A. Dianto, et al., Teori dan Praktik Pembelajaran: Pendekatan Inovatif dalam Pendidikan. [Publisher information not provided], 2025.

[7] J. Lithner, “Creative and imitative mathematical reasoning,” Educational Studies in Mathematics, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 255–276, 2008, doi: 10.1007/s10649-007-9104-2.

[8] R. Leikin and A. Levav-Waynberg, “Mathematical creativity in school mathematics,” ZDM Mathematics Education, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 159–174, 2008, doi: 10.1007/s11858-008-0098-x.

[9] OECD, PISA 2018 Results: What Students Know and Can Do. Paris, France: OECD Publishing, 2019, doi: 10.1787/5f07c754-en.

[10] OECD, PISA 2022 Results: The State of Learning and Equity in Education. Paris, France: OECD Publishing, 2023, doi: 10.1787/53f23881-en.

[11] T. T. Wijaya, W. Hidayat, N. Hermita, and J. A. Alim, “Exploring factors affecting Indonesian students' mathematics performance in PISA 2022,” Infinity Journal, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2024, doi: 10.22460/infinity.v13i1.p1-15.

[12] E. A. Silver, “Fostering creativity through instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing,” ZDM Mathematics Education, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 75–80, 1997, doi: 10.1007/s11858-997-0003-x.

[13] M. Qiftiyah, S. Inayah, T. Udin, I. Jaya, I. M. Fathoni, E. Rustinar, et al., Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Padang, Indonesia: U ME Publishing, 2024.

[14] M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldaña, Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, 2020.

[15] A. Mustadi, R. Yuliana, A. Anugrahana, N. A. NH, I. W. P. Utami, D. Ambarwati, et al., Pembelajaran Transformatif. [Publisher information not provided], 2025.

[16] W. A. Rahayu and P. Subekti, “Implementation of ‘E-Lens’ inquiry-based learning game to improve literacy and numeracy skills,” Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 510–522, 2025, doi: 10.21831/cp.v44i3.76930.

[17] H. Rohyana, I. M. Fathoni, A. A. Nurkhasanah, R. F. Siddiq, and Y. N. A. Syahri, “Penguatan numerasi dan karakter siswa melalui pembelajaran matematika kontekstual di madrasah ibtidaiyah,” Bhakti Mengabdi: Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 70–76, 2026.

[18] OECD, PISA 2015 Results: Excellence and Equity in Education. Paris, France: OECD Publishing, 2016, doi: 10.1787/9789264266490-en.

[19] A. Syafi’i and A. Marfiyanto, “Analisis kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis siswa sekolah dasar dalam menyelesaikan soal open-ended,” Jurnal Elemen, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 415–428, 2023, doi: 10.29408/jel.v9i2.8123.

[20] D. Rahmawati and Y. S. Kusumah, “Pengaruh pembelajaran berbasis masalah terbuka terhadap literasi numerasi siswa sekolah dasar,” Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 45–56, 2022.

[21] A. Prabowo and T. Herman, “Open-ended problem solving in elementary school mathematics: Developing mathematical reasoning and creativity,” Journal of Primary Education, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 289–301, 2021.

[22] R. Novita and M. Putra, “Contextual teaching and learning in enhancing mathematical literacy of elementary students in urban areas,” Indonesian Journal of Primary Education, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 112–124, 2020.

[23] D. H. Schunk, Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective, 8th ed. Pearson, 2020.

[24] K. Yilmaz, “Comparison of quantitative and qualitative research traditions: Epistemological, theoretical, and methodological issues,” European Journal of Education, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 231–245, 2021.

[25] S. T. Shaw, M. L. Luna, B. Rodriguez, J. Yeh, N. Villalta, and G. Ramirez, “Mathematical creativity in elementary school children: General patterns and effects of an incubation break,” Frontiers in Education, vol. 7, Art. no. 835911, 2022, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2022.835911.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-10

How to Cite

Isna Muhammad Fathoni, Hadi Rohyana, Ilham Jaya, Rafi Ahmad Faiz, & Nuraini Hasanah. (2026). Membaca Pola Kreativitas Matematis Siswa SD melalui Tugas Literasi-Numerasi Berbasis Masalah Terbuka . DIAJAR: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 5(4), 1556–1564. https://doi.org/10.54259/diajar.v5i4.9147

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 4 (2026): Oktober 2026

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Isna Muhammad Fathoni

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Hak cipta pada setiap artikel adalah milik penulis.
Penulis mengakui bahwa DIAJAR (Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran) sebagai publisher yang mempublikasikan pertama kali dengan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Penulis dapat memasukan tulisan secara terpisah, mengatur distribusi non-ekskulif dari naskah yang telah terbit di jurnal ini kedalam versi yang lain, seperti: dikirim ke respository institusi penulis, publikasi kedalam buku, dan lain-lain. Dengan mengakui bahwa naskah telah terbit pertama kali pada DIAJAR (Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran).