Interaksi Sosial sebagai Mediator Kunci Dinamika Pembelajaran Pendidikan Jasmani
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54259/diajar.v5i3.7668Keywords:
Learning Process, Learning Outcomes, Social Interaction, Learning Mediation, Physical EducationAbstract
This study aims to analyze the dynamics of the learning process and student learning outcomes by placing social interaction as a mediating variable in Physical Education, Health, and Recreation students at Musamus University. The study used a quantitative approach with an explanatory research design and data analysis based on Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with Partial Least Squares (PLS). Data were collected through a Likert-scale questionnaire that measured the variables of the learning process, social interaction, and learning outcomes, and supported by student academic data. The results showed that the learning process has a significant relationship with social interaction and student learning outcomes. Social interaction was also proven to have a significant effect on learning outcomes and acts as a mediating variable that strengthens the relationship between the learning process and learning outcomes. These findings confirm that the quality of social interaction is a key factor in increasing student engagement and multidimensional learning outcomes. This study provides theoretical contributions in the development of social interaction-based learning models as well as practical implications for lecturers in designing more collaborative, participatory, and contextual learning to improve the quality of student learning outcomes in higher education.
Downloads
References
V. M. Valle-Muñoz, M. Mendoza-Muñoz, and E. Villa-González, “Physical literacy as a pedagogical model in physical education,” Children, vol. 12, no. 8, p. 1008, 2025.
M. Barros, I. Mesquita, and P. Queiros, “How Can a Student-Centered Curriculum Impact Preservice Teachers’ Development of Epistemological Beliefs? A Physical Education Longitudinal Case Study,” J. Teach. Phys. Educ., vol. 1, no. aop, pp. 1–10, 2025.
U. K. Okeke and S. Ramaila, “Reimagining the psychomotor domain: Pedagogical implications of STEAM education,” Educ. Sci., vol. 15, no. 11, p. 1497, 2025.
N. Ramos-Vallecillo and V. Murillo-Ligorred, “Prosignification in Art Education: Project-Based and Meaningful Learning Towards Active Learning,” Encyclopedia, vol. 6, no. 4, p. 86, 2026.
O. T. Adigun, N. Mpofu, and M. C. Maphalala, “Fostering self‐directed learning in blended learning environments: A constructivist perspective in Higher Education,” High. Educ. Q., vol. 79, no. 1, p. e12572, 2025.
H. Zhou, “Exploring the dynamic teaching-learning relationship in interactive learning environments,” Interact. Learn. Environ., vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 4363–4393, 2025.
S. Aslam, Y. Shi, and C. Zhao, “Addressing physical skills and mental health: the role of modern teaching approaches in non-athlete university PE programs,” Front. Psychol., vol. 16, p. 1664027, 2025.
K. Alarabi, B. AlSadrani, H. Tairab, O. Abu Khurma, and N. Kasasbeh, “Does Community Engagement Boost Pre-and In-Service Teachers’ 21st-Century Skills? A Mixed-Method Study,” Soc. Sci., vol. 14, no. 7, p. 410, 2025.
H. Boke et al., “Effects of cooperative learning on students’ learning outcomes in physical education: a meta-analysis,” Front. Psychol., vol. 16, p. 1508808, 2025.
T. Ngoc Tuong Nguyen and D. Thi Kim Oanh, “Cooperative learning and its influences on student engagement,” Cogent Educ., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 2513414, 2025.
S. Garbenis and I. Kaffemaniene, “Developing traits of self-confidence and intrinsic motivation in students with severe special educational needs in physical education lessons,” Behav. Sci. (Basel)., vol. 15, no. 11, p. 1449, 2025.
Y. Yang and Y. F. Lay, “Academic buoyancy and learner interactions as mediators of deep learning in blended learning contexts: The role of teaching, social, and cognitive presence,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 6261–6286, 2025.
P. Sun, K. Ma, X. Xu, and L. Yan, “How self-efficacy shapes professional identity: The mediating role of meaning in life and self-esteem in pre-service physical education teachers,” BMC Psychol., vol. 13, no. 1, p. 387, 2025.
T. Siregar, “Effectiveness of the Problem-Based Learning Model in Improving Students’ Mathematical Communication Skills and Learning Motivation,” 2025.
X. Zhou, M. Zhang, L. Chen, B. Li, and J. Xu, “The effect of peer relationships on college students’ behavioral intentions to be physically active: The chain-mediated role of social support and exercise self-efficacy,” PLoS One, vol. 20, no. 5, p. e0320845, 2025.
M. E. Weissman, Sport psychology services in public schools: Breaking new ground through program development and support for student-athletes and coaches. Rutgers The State University of New Jersey, Graduate School of Applied and …, 2003.
Z. Ben Chaâbane and R. Bejaoui, “Socio-Affective Relationships and Sporting Games: Which Choice for Quality Physical Education,” in Promoting Sustainable Development Goals in Physical Education: The Role of Motor Games, IGI Global Scientific Publishing, 2025, pp. 279–310.
M. Jadwiszczak, S. Wawrzyniak, and K. Pezdek, “More than movement: a systematic review of moral and social development in adolescents physical education,” BMC Public Health, vol. 25, no. 1, p. 2076, 2025.
M. Azzi and Z. Mebarki, “Pedagogical Innovations within the LMD Reform in Algeria: Shifting from Teacher-Centeredness to Learner-Centeredness in EFL Teachers’ Practices,” J. Stud. Lang. Cult. Soc., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 49–68, 2025.
V. Temel and N. H. Özçelik, “The relationship between social safeness and pleasure and resilience levels among university athletes: A descriptive study,” PLoS One, vol. 20, no. 1, p. e0315889, 2025.
H. Järvenoja, T. Törmänen, E. Lehtoaho, M. Turunen, J. Suoraniemi, and J. Edwards, “Investigating peer influence on collaborative group members’ motivation through the lens of socially shared regulation of learning,” Br. J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 1063–1079, 2025.
T. Z. Ningsih et al., “Enhancing communication and collaboration skills through discovery, cooperative and problem-based learning models in Social Studies education,” Cogent Educ., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 2500110, 2025.
H. T. Crogman, V. D. Cano, E. Pacheco, R. B. Sonawane, and R. Boroon, “Virtual reality, augmented reality, and mixed reality in experiential learning: Transforming educational paradigms,” Educ. Sci., vol. 15, no. 3, p. 303, 2025.
Y. Chen and Y. Zhang, “When networks learn to adapt: the plasticity of collaborative learners in a knowledge-building environment,” Interact. Learn. Environ., pp. 1–24, 2026.
V. L. Dara and C. Kesavan, “Analyzing the concept of participatory learning: strategies, trends and future directions in education,” Kybernetes, vol. 54, no. 7, pp. 3882–3915, 2025.
A. L. Novaes, “Enhancing sustainability education in higher education through simulation-based learning: integrating sustainable development goals,” Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ., 2025.
C. T. Doan, T. T. Q. Le, and T. Van Vu, “Examining the role of student–instructor interaction in shaping learning outcomes in higher education,” Eur. J. Educ., vol. 60, no. 4, p. e70237, 2025.
M. Chankseliani, J. Kwak, N. Hanley, A. Akkad, M. Crisostomo, and Z. Wang, “International student mobility and poverty reduction: A qualitative study of the mechanisms of systemic change,” World Dev., vol. 195, p. 107116, 2025.
S. Vijayakumar Bharathi and M. B. Pande, “Does constructivism learning approach lead to developing creative thinking skills? The mediating role of online collaborative learning environments,” J. Comput. Educ., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 551–587, 2025.
X. Liu et al., “Barriers and facilitators to participation in physical activity for students with disabilities in an integrated school setting: a meta-synthesis of qualitative research evidence,” Front. Public Heal., vol. 13, p. 1496631, 2025.
Y. Bai and S. Wang, “Impact of generative AI interaction and output quality on university students’ learning outcomes: a technology-mediated and motivation-driven approach,” Sci. Rep., vol. 15, no. 1, p. 24054, 2025.
P. Selvakumar, B. R. Mishra, T. Mohanapriya, R. Shukla, and M. TC, “Student engagement and motivation in personalized learning,” in Integrating Personalized Learning Methods Into STEAM Education, IGI Global Scientific Publishing, 2025, pp. 123–142.
S. Aufenanger et al., “Immersive virtual reality learning environments for higher education: A student acceptance study,” Comput. Educ. X Real., vol. 7, p. 100105, 2025.
K. Jia, R. Kang, Y. Wang, L. Ma, and X. Liu, “Constructing an empathy education system: Values, principles, and approaches,” J. Moral Educ., pp. 1–29, 2025.
A. Mostrady, E. Sanchez-Lopez, and A. F. Gonzalez-Sanchez, “Microlearning and its effectiveness in modern education: A mini review,” Acta Pedagog. Asiana, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 33–42, 2025.
R. Al-Jarf, “Collaborative learning and teaching in digital environments: A systematic review of two decades of research,” J. Comput. Sci. Technol. Stud., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 25–40, 2026.
J. Reeve, G. Basarkod, H.-R. Jang, R. Gargurevich, H. Jang, and S. H. Cheon, “Specialized purpose of each type of student engagement: A meta-analysis,” Educ. Psychol. Rev., vol. 37, no. 1, p. 13, 2025.
A. Erol, A. S. Saracaloğlu, and B. Dinçer, “The Role of Mind and Intelligence Games in Supporting Student Development: A Focus on Cognitive, Affective, and Psychomotor Domains,” Educ. Youth Res., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 92–112, 2025.
O. Østerlie and C. M. Killian, “Flipped learning in physical education: Evolutions over a decade and future horizons,” Phys. Educ. Sport Pedagog., pp. 1–16, 2025.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pulung Riyanto, Heri Yusuf Muslihin, Andang Rohendi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Hak cipta pada setiap artikel adalah milik penulis.
Penulis mengakui bahwa DIAJAR (Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran) sebagai publisher yang mempublikasikan pertama kali dengan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Penulis dapat memasukan tulisan secara terpisah, mengatur distribusi non-ekskulif dari naskah yang telah terbit di jurnal ini kedalam versi yang lain, seperti: dikirim ke respository institusi penulis, publikasi kedalam buku, dan lain-lain. Dengan mengakui bahwa naskah telah terbit pertama kali pada DIAJAR (Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran).
