Blue Economy Positioning and Corporate Strategic Alignment: How Maritime Enterprises in the Global Industry Reconfigure Business Models Toward Sustainable Ocean Industries

Authors

  • Rosna Yuherlina Siahaan Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54259/manabis.v5i2.7281

Keywords:

Blue Economy, Maritime Corporate Strategy, Business Model Innovation, Ocean Sustainability, Strategic Positioning

Abstract

The Blue Economy — broadly defined as the sustainable use of ocean resources for economic growth, improved livelihoods, and ocean ecosystem health — has emerged as a transformative strategic framework reshaping how maritime enterprises conceptualize, design, and communicate their value propositions in global markets. This study investigates how global maritime enterprises strategically position themselves within the Blue Economy paradigm, examining the processes through which shipping companies, port operators, and maritime logistics organizations reconfigure their business models to align with sustainable ocean industry principles. Drawing on qualitative thematic analysis of thirty in-depth interviews with maritime C-suite executives, Blue Economy policy architects, sustainability strategists, and port development specialists, the research identifies four strategic positioning archetypes and three business model reconfiguration pathways. Findings reveal that successful Blue Economy alignment requires coherent integration of national maritime policy frameworks, stakeholder ecosystem management, and organizational capability reconfiguration — dimensions that individually insufficient Blue Economy strategies systematically neglect. The study advances maritime strategic management scholarship by providing an empirically grounded framework for Blue Economy corporate strategy in global maritime enterprises.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Caldeirinha, V., Felício, J. A., Pinho, T., & Rodrigues, R. (2024). Fuzzy-set QCA on performance and sustainability determinants of ports supporting floating offshore wind farms. Sustainability, 16(7), 2947. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072947

Caldas, P., Pedro, M. I., & Marques, R. C. (2024). An assessment of container seaport efficiency determinants. Sustainability, 16(11), 4427. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114427

Chae, G.-Y., An, S.-H., & Lee, C.-Y. (2021). Demand forecasting for liquified natural gas bunkering by country and region using meta-analysis and artificial intelligence. Sustainability, 13(16), 9058. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169058

Du, S., Zhang, H. S., & Kong, Y. (2023). Sustainability implications of the Arctic shipping route for Shanghai port logistics in the post-pandemic era. Sustainability, 15(22), 16017. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152216017

Jian-ping, S., Fang, C., Chen, Z., & Chen, G. (2021). Regional cooperation in marine plastic waste cleanup in the South China Sea region. Sustainability, 13(16), 9221. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169221

Kim, B., Kim, G., & Kang, M.-H. (2022). Study on comparing the performance of fully automated container terminals during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 14(15), 9415. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159415

Kim, S.-K., Choi, S., & Kim, C. (2021). The framework for measuring port resilience in Korean port case. Sustainability, 13(21), 11883. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111883

Liao, Y.-H., & Lee, H.-S. (2023). Using a directional distance function to measure the environmental efficiency of international liner shipping companies and assess regulatory impact. Sustainability, 15(4), 3821. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043821

Mwendapole, M. J., & Jin, Z. (2021). Evaluation of seaport service quality in Tanzania: From the Dar Es Salaam seaport perspective. Sustainability, 13(18), 10076. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810076

Paridaens, H., & Notteboom, T. (2021). National integrated maritime policies (IMP): Vision formulation, regional embeddedness, and institutional attributes for effective policy integration. Sustainability, 13(17), 9557. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179557

Pian, F., Xu, L., Chen, Y., & Lee, S.-H. (2020). Global emission taxes and port privatization policies under international competition. Sustainability, 12(16), 6595. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166595

Qi, J., Wang, S., & Zheng, J. (2022). Shore power deployment problem—A case study of a Chinese container shipping network. Sustainability, 14(11), 6928. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116928

Yao, Y., Zheng, R., & Parmak, M. (2021). Examining the constraints on yachting tourism development in China: A qualitative study of stakeholder perceptions. Sustainability, 13(23), 13178. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313178

Zhang, W., Zhang, Y., & Qiao, W. (2022). Risk scenario evaluation for intelligent ships by mapping hierarchical holographic modeling into risk filtering, ranking and management. Sustainability, 14(4), 2103. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042103

Zhou, K., Yuan, X., Guo, Z., Wu, J., & Li, R. (2024). Research on sustainable port: Evaluation of green port policies on China's coasts. Sustainability, 16(10), 4017. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104017

Zhu, J., Yan, W., He, J., Hafeez, M., & Sohail, S. (2024). Exploring the convergence of ICT, digital financial inclusion, environmental pressures, and free trade and their significance in driving sustainable green investment initiatives under carbon neutrality targets. Heliyon, 10(11), e31102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31102

Bilal, A., Xiao-ping, L., Nanli, Z., Sharma, R., & Jahanger, A. (2021). Green technology innovation, globalization, and CO2 emissions: Recent insights from the OBOR economies. Sustainability, 14(1), 236. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010236

Downloads

Published

2026-06-15

How to Cite

Rosna Yuherlina Siahaan. (2026). Blue Economy Positioning and Corporate Strategic Alignment: How Maritime Enterprises in the Global Industry Reconfigure Business Models Toward Sustainable Ocean Industries. MANABIS: Jurnal Manajemen Dan Bisnis, 5(2), 438–443. https://doi.org/10.54259/manabis.v5i2.7281

Issue

Section

Articles