Enhancing Technical Competency in Naval Engine Systems through Industry-Based Learning in Maritime Vocational Education

Authors

  • R.Herlan Guntoro Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran Jakarta
  • Pargaulan Dwikora Simanjuntak Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54259/diajar.v4i2.4255

Keywords:

Industry-Based Learning , Maritime Vocational Education , Naval Engine Systems , Professional Experience , Technical Competency

Abstract

This research explores the enhancement of technical competency in naval engine systems through industry-based learning approaches within maritime vocational education. Employing a qualitative descriptive method, the study involved two participant groups: experienced maritime professionals with over 20 years of sea service who now serve in managerial, advisory, and auditing roles in port and shipping industries, and ten vocational lecturers with sea-going experience and extensive teaching expertise in marine engineering. Findings revealed a substantial gap between classroom-based theoretical instruction and the practical realities of engine room operations. Contributing factors include outdated curricula, limited industry engagement in teaching processes, and insufficient access to real-life engine room practice. Both professionals and educators highlighted the urgency of integrating experiential learning models to align educational outcomes with industry demands. The study emphasizes the need for curriculum reform grounded in real-world operations, competency-based assessment methods, and structured mentorship from industry practitioners. By bridging the disconnect between institutional instruction and shipboard operations, this research contributes a strategic framework for developing adaptive, skilled, and industry-ready maritime graduates in engine systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

M. Plaza-Hernández, A. B. Gil-González, S. Rodríguez-González, J. Prieto-Tejedor, and J. M. Corchado-Rodríguez, “Integration of IoT technologies in the maritime industry,” in Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence, Special Sessions, 17th International Conference, 2021, pp. 107–115.

I. de la Peña Zarzuelo, M. J. F. Soeane, and B. L. Bermúdez, “Industry 4.0 in the port and maritime industry: A literature review,” J. Ind. Inf. Integr., vol. 20, p. 100173, 2020.

V. Bolbot et al., “Identification and analysis of educational needs for naval architects and marine engineers in relation to the foreseen context of Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS),” 2022.

F. C. Domingues, “907 Maritime History and Maritime Archaeology,” The Oxford Handbook of Maritime Archaeology. Oxford University Press, p. 0, Dec. 12, 2013. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199336005.013.0039.

H. P. Berg, “Human factors and safety culture in maritime safety,” Mar. Navig. Saf. Sea Transp. STCW, Marit. Educ. Train. (MET), Hum. Resour. Crew Manning, Marit. Policy, Logist. Econ. Matters, vol. 107, pp. 107–115, 2013.

E. Demirel, “Maritime education and training in the digital era,” Univers. J. Educ. Res., 2020.

A. Sharma, “Potential of technology supported competence development for Maritime Education and Training,” 2023.

M. Borkowski, J. Baur, W. Kelly, and V. Martinez, “Reimagining the Navy’s Planned Maintenance System,” Nav. Eng. J., vol. 126, no. 3, pp. 95–102, 2014.

T. Kim and S. Mallam, “A Delphi-AHP study on STCW leadership competence in the age of autonomous maritime operations,” WMU J. Marit. Aff., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 163–181, 2020.

I. Christodoulou-Varotsi and D. A. Pentsov, “The STCW Convention and related instruments,” Marit. Work Law Fundam. Responsible Shipowners, Reliab. Seafar., pp. 422–639, 2008.

C. Young, “Comprehensive Revision of the STCW convention: an overview,” J. Mar. L. Com., vol. 26, p. 1, 1995.

A. P. Antony, K. Leith, C. Jolley, J. Lu, and D. J. Sweeney, “A review of practice and implementation of the internet of things (IoT) for smallholder agriculture,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 9, p. 3750, 2020.

N. Rane, S. Choudhary, and J. Rane, “Artificial Intelligence (Ai) and Internet of Things (Iot)–based sensors for monitoring and controlling in architecture, engineering, and construction: Applications, challenges, and opportunities,” Eng. Constr. Appl. Challenges, Oppor. (November 20, 2023), 2023.

D. Gavalas, T. Syriopoulos, and E. Roumpis, “Digital adoption and efficiency in the maritime industry,” J. Shipp. Trade, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 11, 2022.

S. Pu and J. S. L. Lam, “Blockchain adoptions in the maritime industry: a conceptual framework,” Marit. Policy Manag., vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 777–794, 2021.

S. L. Siedlecki, “Understanding descriptive research designs and methods,” Clin. Nurse Spec., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 8–12, 2020.

D. K. Padgett, Qualitative methods in social work research, vol. 36. Sage publications, 2016.

M. Brenker, S. Möckel, M. Küper, S. Schmid, M. Spann, and S. Strohschneider, “Challenges of multinational crewing: a qualitative study with cadets,” WMU J. Marit. Aff., vol. 16, pp. 365–384, 2017.

K. Yilmaz, “Comparison of quantitative and qualitative research traditions: Epistemological, theoretical, and methodological differences,” Eur. J. Educ., vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 311–325, 2013.

H. Kim, J. S. Sefcik, and C. Bradway, “Characteristics of qualitative descriptive studies: A systematic review,” Res. Nurs. Health, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 23–42, 2017.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-20

How to Cite

R.Herlan Guntoro, & Pargaulan Dwikora Simanjuntak. (2025). Enhancing Technical Competency in Naval Engine Systems through Industry-Based Learning in Maritime Vocational Education. DIAJAR: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 4(2), 300–307. https://doi.org/10.54259/diajar.v4i2.4255

Issue

Section

Articles