IMPACT OF TOURISM VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT ON LOCAL COMMUNITY ECONOMY: CASE STUDY OF TETEBATU VILLAGE, LOMBOK

Authors

  • Taufiq Kurniawan Institut Studi Islam Sunan Doe
  • Saleh Yahya Himni Institut Studi Islam Sunan Doe
  • Sulhairi Institut Studi Islam Sunan Doe

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54259/manabis.v1i3.807

Keywords:

Economic Impact, Tourist Village Development, Local Society Economy

Abstract

Research on the impact of tourist village development on local community economy is a descriptive qualitative-based research. This research was conducted in Tetebatu Village, Lombok, Indonesia. The survey results revealed that the development activities of the tourist village of Tetebatu considered quite good, the main indicator is the average increase in tourist arrivals sizeable year-on-year. The readiness of local communities in terms of education, knowledge, and level of community involvement in the development of Tetebatu tourist village shows that the public has been sufficiently prepared to deal with potential impacts that arise. The level of development of tourism which generates high frequency level of interaction local communities and frequent travelers, which is an average of more than 5 times in the interaction per 3 months. The result shows that developing a tourist village brings a positive impact to the economic development of local communities in the Village of Tetebatu, including: the increase of public income; the increase of employment and business opportunities; the increase of ownership and control of local communities; the increase of government revenues through travel levy. While the indications of negative impact on the local economy in the form of rising prices of goods cannot be found.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arnstein, S.R. 1969. A Ladder of Citizen Participation JAIP. Vol. 35. No 4, pp 216-244 dilihat pada http//Lithgow-Schmidt/Sherry-arnstein/ladder-of-citizen-participation. Pdf tanggal 30 Oktober 2009.

AZAHRA, Rarin Karisma; KHADIYANTO, Parfi. Pengaruh Keberadaan Desa Wisata Terhadap Peningkatan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat (Studi Kasus: Desa Karang Tengah, Kabupaten Bantul). Ruang, 2013, 1.1: 51-60.

Garrod, B., 2001. Local Participation in the Planning and Management of Eco-tourism. Bristol. University of the West of England.

Proyek Pemanfaatan Kebudayaan Daerah Lombok Timur 2006. (2006). Petunjuk Teknis Penelitian Budaya. East Lombok.

SURYADANA, M. Liga. Sosiologi Pariwisata: Kajian Kepariwisataan dalam Paradigma Intergratif-Transformatif menuju Wisata Spiritual. Humaniora, 2013.

Theng, S., 2015. Mass Tourism vs Alternative Tourism? Challenges and New Positionings. Retrieved February 21, 2019, from

Urry, Jhon. 1991. The Tourist Gaze: Leisure and Travel in Contemporary Societies. London: SAGE Publication.

World Tourism Organization (WTO), 2004. Tourism and Poverty Alleviation/. Recommendation for Action. Madrid, Spain:

Indonesia, P. R. Undangundang No. 10 tahun 2009 tentang Kepariwisataan, Sekretariat Negara. Jakarta. (2009).

Inskeep, E. 1991. Tourism Planning, and Integrated Sustainable Development Approach. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

KRISTIANA, Yustisia. Buku Ajar Studi Ekowisata. Deepublish, 2019.

Lewis, J. 2003. Design Issues. In Qualitative Research Practice: a Guide for Social Science Student Researcher (eds). Jane Ritchie and Janes Lewis. London: SAGE Publications.

NASRULLAH, Nasrullah, et al. Pemasaran Pariwisata: Konsep, Perencanaan & Implementasi. Yayasan Kita Menulis, 2020.

Neil, J., and Wearing, S., 1999. Ecotourism: Impacts, Potentials and Possibilities. Oxford: Reed Educational and Professional Publishing Ltd.

Pitana, I. (2009). Pengantar Ilmu Pariwisata. Pengantar Ilmu Pariwisata. Yogyakarta: Andi.

Pitana, I. G., dan Gayatri, P. G. (2005). Sosiologi Pariwisata. Yogyakarta: Publisher Andi.

Pitana, I. G., dan Putu, G. (2009). Sosiologi Pariwisata. Sosiologi Pariwisata. Yogyakarta: Andi.

RACO, Jozef. Metode penelitian kualitatif: jenis, karakteristik dan keunggulannya. 2018.

SILALAHI, Ulber. Metode dan Metodologi Penelitian. 1999.

Suansri, P., 2003. Community Based Tourism Handbook. Thailand: REST Project.

SUTIKSNO, Dian Utami, et al. Tourism Marketing. Yayasan Kita Menulis, 2020.

YOETY, Oka A. Ekonomi pariwisata: introduksi, informasi, dan aplikasi. Penerbit Buku Kompas, 2008.

Artikel Online

BAGIANA, IGBYS; YASA, I. Nyoman Mahaendra. Pengembangan Desa Wisata Terhadap Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Desa Penglipuran, Kecamatan Bangli, Kabupaten Bangli. E-Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan Universitas Udayana, 2017, 6.9: 1836-1867, https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=id&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=43.%09BAGIANA%2C+IGBYS%3B+YASA%2C+I.+Nyoman+Mahaendra.+Pengembangan+Desa+Wisata+Terhadap+Kesejahteraan+Masyarakat+Desa+Penglipuran%2C+Kecamatan+Bangli%2C+Kabupaten+Bangli.+E-Jurnal+Ekonomi+Pembangunan+Universitas+Udayana%2C+2017%2C+6.9%3A+1836-1867.&btnG=

Dinas Pariwisata, Nusa Tenggara Barat. Statistik Kepariwisataan 2016. Nusa Tenggara Barat, Retrieved April (Vol. 21). Nusa Tenggara Barat Indonesia.

Harssel, Jan Van. 1994. Tourism and Exploration. Prentice Hall Career and Technology Englewood Cliffs, Unites States of America.

Komala, I. D. A., Waseh, H., dan Rahmawati, R. (2015). Implementasi Kebijakan dan Kendala Pengembangan Kawasan Ekonomi Khusus (KEK) Pariwisata Tanjung Lesung, Kabupaten Pandeglang, Provinsi Banten. Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa.

PAMUNGKAS, Istiqomah Tya Dewi; MUKTIALI, Mohammad. Pengaruh Keberadaan Desa Wisata Karangbanjar Terhadap Perubahan Penggunaan Lahan, Ekonomi dan Sosial Masyarakat. Teknik PWK (Perencanaan Wilayah Kota), 2015, 4.3: 361-372, https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=id&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=35.%09PAMUNGKAS%2C+Istiqomah+Tya+Dewi%3B+MUKTIALI%2C+Mohammad.+Pengaruh+Keberadaan+Desa+Wisata+Karangbanjar+Terhadap+Perubahan+Penggunaan+Lahan%2C+Ekonomi+dan+Sosial+Masyarakat.+Teknik+PWK+%28Perencanaan+Wilayah+Kota%29%2C+2015%2C+4.3%3A+361-372.&btnG=

RISTIYANA, Puspita; MUKTIALI, Mohammad. Pengaruh Keberadaan Desa Wisata Tanon Kecamatan Getasan terhadap Ekonomi Masyarakat Lokal dan Guna Lahan. Teknik PWK (Perencanaan Wilayah Kota), 2020, 9.1, https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=id&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=46.%09RISTIYANA%2C+Puspita%3B+MUKTIALI%2C+Mohammad.+Pengaruh+Keberadaan+Desa+Wisata+Tanon+Kecamatan+Getasan+terhadap+Ekonomi+Masyarakat+Lokal+dan+Guna+Lahan.+Teknik+PWK+%28Perencanaan+Wilayah+Kota%29%2C+2020%2C+9.1.&btnG= PRATIWI, Yulian Dwi Indah. PENGARUH AKTIVITAS DESA WISATA TERHADAP EKONOMI MASYARAKAT DI DESA KOPENG, KECAMATAN GETASAN, KABUPATEN SEMARANG. 2019. PhD Thesis. Universitas Islam Sultan Agung, https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=id&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=48.%09PRATIWI%2C+Yulian+Dwi+Indah.+PENGARUH+AKTIVITAS+DESA+WISATA+TERHADAP+EKONOMI+MASYARAKAT+DI+DESA+KOPENG%2C+KECAMATAN+GETASAN%2C+KABUPATEN+SEMARANG.+2019.+PhD+Thesis.+Universitas+Islam+Sultan+Agung.&btnG=

SAFITRA, Ariga Rahmad; YUSMAN, Fitri. Pengaruh Desa Wisata Kandri terhadap Peningkatan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Kelurahan Kandri Kota Semarang (Studi Kasus: Kelurahan Kandri Semarang). Teknik PWK (Perencanaan Wilayah Kota), 2014, 3.4: 908-917, https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=id&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=41.%09SAFITRA%2C+Ariga+Rahmad%3B+YUSMAN%2C+Fitri.+Pengaruh+Desa+Wisata+Kandri+terhadap+Peningkatan+Kesejahteraan+Masyarakat+Kelurahan+Kandri+Kota+Semarang+%28Studi+Kasus%3A+Kelurahan+Kandri+Semarang%29.+Teknik+PWK+%28Perencanaan+Wilayah+Kota%29%2C+2014%2C+3.4%3A+908-917.&btnG=

WIHASTA, Candra Restu; PRAKOSO, H. B. S. Perkembangan Desa Wisata Kembang Arum dan Dampaknya Terhadap Kondisi Sosial Ekonomi Masyarakat Donokerto Kecamatan Turi. Jurnal Bumi Indonesia, 2012, 1.1, https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=id&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=39.%09WIHASTA%2C+Candra+Restu%3B+PRAKOSO%2C+H.+B.+S.+Perkembangan+Desa+Wisata+Kembang+Arum+dan+Dampaknya+Terhadap+Kondisi+Sosial+Ekonomi+Masyarakat+Donokerto+Kecamatan+Turi.+Jurnal+Bumi+Indonesia%2C+2012%2C+1.1.&btnG=

Downloads

Published

2022-09-30

How to Cite

Kurniawan, T., Himni, S. Y. ., & Sulhairi. (2022). IMPACT OF TOURISM VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT ON LOCAL COMMUNITY ECONOMY: CASE STUDY OF TETEBATU VILLAGE, LOMBOK. MANABIS: Jurnal Manajemen Dan Bisnis, 1(3), 186–201. https://doi.org/10.54259/manabis.v1i3.807