GENERATIVE AI POLICIES

This policy explains how authors, editors, and reviewers of Sehat Rakyat: Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat may and may not use generative AI tools, and how that use must be disclosed. The responsibility for the work always stays with people.

Human
authors stay fully accountable
Disclose
every use of AI in the manuscript
Verify
all AI assisted content and references
Never upload
unpublished manuscripts to AI tools

1Introduction


Generative AI refers to tools that can produce text, images, audio, or synthetic data. Examples include ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Claude, NovelAI, and Jasper AI. Such tools can help to develop ideas, organize the research workflow, support data analysis, improve the quality of writing, help authors who are not native speakers of English, and speed up the dissemination of research.

Risk What it means
Inaccuracy and bias Output may be wrong or biased, including “hallucinations” that look convincing.
Weak attribution Sources, quotations, and citations may be missing, wrong, or invented.
Confidentiality and intellectual property Material uploaded to third party platforms may be exposed.
Secondary use by providers Providers may reuse uploaded material, for example to train their models.

This policy will be revised as standards develop.


2Policy at a Glance


Use of generative AI Status Condition
Improving grammar, language quality, and readability, including translating the authors’ own text ✓ Permitted The authors verify the output and disclose the use.
Generating ideas, searching for and categorizing literature, and supporting coding ✓ Permitted The authors verify the output and disclose the use.
Learning about AI tools, or using them as part of a study, an intervention, or an instrument ✓ Permitted Described in the Methods.
Listing an AI tool as an author ✕ Not permitted No exception.
Submitting AI text or code that has not been reviewed and edited ✕ Not permitted No exception.
Replacing missing empirical data with synthetic data without a sound methodology ✕ Not permitted No exception.
Creating or altering original images, figures, or research data ✕ Not permitted No exception.
Citing references produced by AI that have not been verified ✕ Not permitted No exception.
Uploading unpublished manuscripts or related files to AI tools (editors and reviewers) ✕ Not permitted No exception.
Using AI to assess, summarize, or evaluate a manuscript (reviewers) ✕ Not permitted AI may be used only to improve the language of the review report.

3Authors


3.1 Permitted Use

Authors may use tools such as ChatGPT to improve grammar, language quality, and readability. Authors may also translate their own text, for example the abstract, as long as they make sure the translation is accurate.

3.2 Accountability and Human Authorship

Authors are fully responsible for the originality, accuracy, validity, and ethics of their work, and they must verify all content that was produced with the help of AI. The work must be essentially written by people. The journal decides on publication.

3.3 AI Tools Cannot Be Authors

An AI tool cannot be listed as an author, because it cannot take responsibility, approve a publication, or sign copyright and licensing agreements. See Authorship and Contributorship.

3.4 Prohibited Reliance on AI

No. A manuscript must not contain
1 AI text or code that the authors have not reviewed and edited.
2 Synthetic data that replace empirical data, unless there is a clear and sound methodology.
3 Inaccurate AI content, including in the abstract and in supplementary material.

A violation may lead to editorial review or an investigation.

3.5 Images, Figures, and Data

AI must not be used to create or alter images, figures, or research data that will be published. This covers graphs, tables, medical images, parts of an image, code, and formulas. Adding, removing, hiding, or moving elements of an image counts as altering it.

3.6 References and Citations

Authors must check every reference and DOI against the original source. Fake or falsified references are a violation of research integrity. See the Plagiarism and Research Integrity Policy.

3.7 Research About AI in Health

A study that examines the use of AI, or that uses AI as part of an intervention, a health service, an instrument, or an analysis, must describe the tool, its version, how it was used, and its settings in the Methods.

3.8 Confidentiality and Participant Data

Personal or identifiable data of participants, patients, health workers, or other individuals, and unpublished research data, must not be uploaded to AI tools. The only exception is when the consent of the participants allows it and the terms of the tool give adequate protection. Authors must make sure that intellectual property, confidentiality, and data security are protected.

3.9 Disclosure

Every use of AI in preparing the manuscript must be disclosed. The statement gives the name and version of the tool, how it was used, and the purpose. The place of the statement depends on the kind of use.

Kind of use Where to place the statement
AI is part of the research, for example coding or the categorization of literature In the Methods section (METODE)
AI is used for language editing or translation In the Acknowledgments section (UCAPAN TERIMA KASIH)

Example of a disclosure statement

During the preparation of this manuscript, the authors used [name and version of the tool] for [purpose]. The authors reviewed and edited the output and take full responsibility for the content of the manuscript.

Selama penyusunan naskah ini, penulis menggunakan [nama dan versi perangkat] untuk [tujuan]. Penulis telah meninjau dan menyunting keluaran tersebut dan bertanggung jawab penuh atas isi naskah.

The place for disclosure statements in the manuscript is described in Manuscript Preparation.


4Editors and Peer Reviewers


Unpublished manuscripts, images, files, and related information must not be uploaded to AI platforms, because this may breach the confidentiality and the intellectual property rights of the authors.

Role Rule
Editors Editors must keep manuscripts and the review process confidential, and must not upload manuscript material to generative AI platforms.
Peer reviewers Reviewers must not use AI to assess, summarize, or evaluate a manuscript or a proposal, and must not upload unpublished content. AI may be used only to improve the language of the review report. Reviewers remain responsible for the accuracy, the judgment, and the integrity of their review.

See also the Peer Review Process.


5Handling of Violations


Topic How it is handled
Suspected violations They are examined under the Allegations of Misconduct policy.
Consequences Depending on the seriousness of the case: a request for clarification or revision, or rejection of the manuscript.
Published articles Action follows the Correction and Retraction policy.
Conflicts of interest A conflict of interest linked to the use of AI must be declared under Conflicts of Interest.

✓Related Pages and Enquiries


AI may help with language, ideas, and literature work, but people remain fully responsible for the work. Every use must be disclosed, AI cannot be an author, AI must not create or alter research data or images, and unpublished manuscripts must never be uploaded to AI tools.