Effectiveness of the 5E Learning Cycle Model in Vocational Pharmaceutical Chemistry Learning: A Review

Authors

  • Dwi Putri Rejeki Akademi Farmasi YPPM Mandiri
  • Fita Nelyza Universitas Iskandar Muda
  • Irma Zarwinda Akademi Analis Farmasi dan Makanan, Yayasan Harapan Bangsa, Banda Aceh
  • Eva Novita Akademi Farmasi YPPM Mandiri

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54259/diajar.v5i1.6766

Keywords:

Learning Cycle 5E, Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Conceptual Understanding, Scientific Attitude, Literature Review

Abstract

This study is a systematic literature review aimed at analyzing the effectiveness of the Learning Cycle 5E instructional model in enhancing students’ conceptual understanding and scientific attitudes, while also examining its potential application in Pharmaceutical Chemistry learning at the vocational higher education level. This review addresses the growing need for active learning models that can bridge conceptual understanding with the practical competency demands of pharmaceutical education. The analysis employed a narrative synthesis approach, reviewing relevant research articles based on four main dimensions: learning context, research focus, research methodology, and reported key findings. The results indicate that the Learning Cycle 5E model consistently improves students’ conceptual understanding, reduces misconceptions, and fosters the development of scientific attitudes such as curiosity, responsibility, openness to evidence, and reflective thinking. In addition, several studies report that integrating the Learning Cycle 5E model with interactive learning technologies, including digital media and student-centered learning tools, enhances student motivation and active engagement in the learning process. Although most of the reviewed studies are situated within general chemistry education, the findings demonstrate strong relevance and high potential for application in Pharmaceutical Chemistry learning contexts. Therefore, this review recommends further implementation-based research in vocational higher education to strengthen empirical evidence and optimize the design of active, contextual, and reflective pharmaceutical learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

C. Y. Choo, L. C. Ming, and C. S. Tan, “Fostering critical thinking in pharmaceutical chemistry: A cross-sectional study,” Pharmacy Education, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 866–871, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.46542/pe.2022.221.866871.

H. Ruiz-Martín and R. W. Bybee, “The cognitive principles of learning underlying the 5E Model of Instruction,” Dec. 01, 2022, Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. doi: 10.1186/s40594-022-00337-z.

Z. Ali, H. Ullah, Ahmad Sajid, and S. Ahmed, “Effect of 5e Instructional Model On Students Learning Outcomes in The Subject of Chemistry,” Social Science Review Archives, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 2503–2515, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.70670/sra.v3i1.560.

I. Sotáková and M. Ganajová, “The effect of the 5E instructional model on students’ cognitive processes and their attitudes towards chemistry as a subject,” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 19, no. 9, 2023, doi: 10.29333/EJMSTE/13469.

L. Varoglu, A. Yilmaz, and S. Sen, “Effect of 5E learning cycle assisted with concept maps on conceptual understanding,” Pedagogical Research, vol. 8, no. 3, p. em0161, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.29333/pr/13167.

F. G. I. Grau, C. Valls, N. Piqué, and H. Ruiz-Martín, “The long-term effects of introducing the 5E model of instruction on students’ conceptual learning,” Int J Sci Educ, vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 1441–1458, 2021, doi: 10.1080/09500693.2021.1918354.

N. M. A. Wiriani and I. M. Ardana, “The Impact of the 5E Learning Cycle Model Based on the STEM Approach on Scientific Attitudes and Science Learning Outcomes,” MIMBAR PGSD Undiksha, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 300–307, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.23887/jjpgsd.v10i2.48515.

M. Tüysüz and Ö. Geban, “The Effect of 5E Learning Cycle and Multiple Intelligence Approach on 9th Grade Students’ Achievement, Attitude, and Motivation toward Chemistry on Unit of Chemical Properties,” Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 612–644, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.14686/buefad.724352.

F. Putra, I. Y. Nur Kholifah, B. Subali, and A. Rusilowati, “5E-Learning Cycle Strategy: Increasing Conceptual Understanding and Learning Motivation,” Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 171, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v7i2.2898.

Faizin and Jupri Wahab, “5E Learning Cycle Model To Improve Students’ Scientific Attitude,” IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1–03, 2018, doi: 10.9790/7388-0803010103.

A. D. Pitaloka, Muntholib, and Dasianto, “Learning Cycle 5E through Interactive Simulator to Improve Understanding of Molecular shapes and Chemistry Identity,” Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia, vol. 13, no. 3, p. 65145, 2025, doi: 10.33394/hjkk.v13i3.15842.

H. Hikmawati, I. W. Suastra, and N. M. Pujani, “Ethnoscience-Based Science Learning Model to Develop Critical Thinking Ability and Local Cultural Concern for Junior High School Students in Lombok,” Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 60–66, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v7i1.530.

D. Elfrida and R. Selly, “Differences Of Students’ Chemistry Learning Outcomes Based On The 5e Learning Cycle Model,” Jurnal Pena Sains, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 48–56, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.21107/jps.v10i2.19275.

H. Snyder, “Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines,” J Bus Res, vol. 104, pp. 333–339, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039.

N. R. Haddaway, M. J. Page, C. C. Pritchard, and L. A. McGuinness, “PRISMA2020: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis,” Campbell Systematic Reviews, vol. 18, no. 2, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1002/cl2.1230.

M. Taufiq, “Remediasi Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa Calon Guru Fisika Pada Konsep Gaya Melalui Penerapan Model Siklus Belajar (Learning Cycle) 5E,” 2012. [Online]. Available: http://journal.unnes.ac.id/index.php/jpii

S. Susanti, N. Annafi, and A. Wiraningtyas, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 5e Terhadap Hasil Belajar Ranah Kognitif Siswa Kelas XI IPA SMAN 1 Palibelo Pada Materi Kesetimbangan Ion Dan Ph Larutan Garam,” Jurnal Redoks : Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia dan Ilmu Kimia, vol. 5, 2022.

endang Sulastri, “Integrasi Students Generated Representations (SGRS) Dalam Model Learning Cycle 5E Untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep dan Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa SMA Pada Materi Suhu dan Kalor,” Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, 2016.

T. Pambudi, “Pengaruh Pembelajaran Kimia dengan Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 5E Menggunakan Laboratorium Real dan Virtual Ditinjau dari Sikap Ilmiah terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa pada Materi Pokok Hidrolisis Garam Kelas XI MIPA SMA Negeri 3 Surakarta Tahun Ajaran,” Universitas Sebelas Maret, 2014.

S. Oktavia and A. Malik, “Perbandingan Sikap Ilmiah Siswa Antara Model Learning Cycle 5e Menggunakan Laboratorium Real Dengan Laboratorium Virtual Pada Materi Titrasi Asam Basa Kelas XI SMA Islam Al-Falah Jambi,” Jurnal SAINMATIKA UNJA, vol. 5, no. 2, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/sainmatika

R. Rahmawati, “The Effect of Learning Cycle 5e Learning Model on Students’ Motivation and Learning Outcome,” Journal La Edusci, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 97–107, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.37899/journallaedusci.v5i2.1435.

M. Jian, D. Jin, and X. Wu, “Research hotspots and development trends of international learning cycle model:Bibliometric analysis based on CiteSpace,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 11, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22076.

F. Dahalan, N. Alias, and M. S. N. Shaharom, “Gamification and Game Based Learning for Vocational Education and Training: A Systematic Literature Review,” Educ Inf Technol (Dordr), vol. 29, pp. 1279–1317, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.30880/jtet.2020.12.01.007.

R. Setiawan, D. Mardapi, A. Pratama, and S. Ramadan, “Efektivitas blended learning dalam inovasi pendidikan era industri 4.0 pada mata kuliah teori tes klasik,” Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 148–158, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.21831/jitp.v6i2.27259.

J. R. Polanin, M. Austin, J. A. Taylor, R. R. Steingut, M. A. Rodgers, and R. Williams, “Effects of the 5E Instructional Model: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” AERA Open, vol. 10, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1177/23328584241269866.

C. Joswick and M. Hulings, “A Systematic Review of BSCS 5E Instructional Model Evidence,” Int J Sci Math Educ, vol. 22, pp. 167–188, 2024.

M. A. Zia and F. R. Choudhary, “5E Instructional Model: A Constructivist Model For Teaching Chemistry At Higher Secondary Level,” PJER, vol. 3, no. 2, 2020.

T. Ohn-Sabatello, “Incorporating Technology Tools and the 5E Instructional Model to Teach High School Students Chemistry by Online Instruction,” J Chem Educ, vol. 97, no. 11, pp. 4202–4208, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00824.

M. B. Permatasari, S. Rahayu, and I. W. Dasna, “Chemistry Learning Using Multiple Representations: A Systematic Literature Review,” Journal of Science Learning, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 334–341, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.17509/jsl.v5i2.42656.

E. Byusa, E. Kampire, and A. R. Mwesigye, “Game-based learning approach on students’ motivation and understanding of chemistry concepts: A systematic review of literature,” May 01, 2022, Elsevier Ltd. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09541.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-15

How to Cite

Dwi Putri Rejeki, Fita Nelyza, Irma Zarwinda, & Eva Novita. (2026). Effectiveness of the 5E Learning Cycle Model in Vocational Pharmaceutical Chemistry Learning: A Review. DIAJAR: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 5(1), 182–192. https://doi.org/10.54259/diajar.v5i1.6766